To Alexander Bain 9 October 1873
Down Beckenham
Oct. 9. 1873
My dear Sir
I am particularly obliged to you for having sent me your essay.1 Your criticisms are all written in a quite fair spirit, and indeed no one who knows you or your works would expect anything else.2 What you say about the vagueness of what I hav⟨e⟩ called the direct action of the nervous system, is perfectly just: I felt it so at the time, and even more of late.3 I confess that I have never been able f⟨ully⟩ to grasp your principle of spontaneity,4 as well as some other of your points, so as to apply them to special cases. But as we look at every thing from different points of view, it is not likely that we should agree closely.
I have been greatly pleased by what you say about the crying expression and about blushing.5 Did you read a review in a late Edin.? It was magnificently contemptuous towards myself and many others.6
I retain a very pleasant recollection of our sojourn together at that delightful place Moor Park.7
With my renewed thanks, I remain my dear Sir | Yours sincerely Ch. Darwin
Footnotes
Bibliography
Bain, Alexander. 1873. Review of ‘Darwin on expression:’ being a postscript to The senses and the intellect. London: Longmans, Green, & Co.
Bain, Alexander. 1904. Autobiography. London, New York, and Bombay: Longmans, Green, and Co.
[Baynes, Thomas Spencer.] 1873. [Review of Expression.] Edinburgh Review 137: 492–528.
Browne, Janet. 2002. Charles Darwin. The power of place. Volume II of a biography. London: Pimlico.
Correspondence: The correspondence of Charles Darwin. Edited by Frederick Burkhardt et al. 29 vols to date. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1985–.
Descent: The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. By Charles Darwin. 2 vols. London: John Murray. 1871.
Expression: The expression of the emotions in man and animals. By Charles Darwin. London: John Murray. 1872.
Summary
Thanks AB for his review of Expression [May 1873, in The senses and the intellect, 3d ed. (1874), pp. 697–714]. Admits vagueness of some points. Has never grasped AB’s principle of spontaneity. But, as they look at everything so differently, it is not likely that they should agree closely.
A recent review by T. S. Baynes, [Edinburgh Rev. 137 (1873): 492–528] is "magnificently contemptuous" toward CD and many others.
Letter details
- Letter no.
- DCP-LETT-9092
- From
- Charles Robert Darwin
- To
- Alexander Bain
- Sent from
- Down
- Source of text
- DAR 143: 27
- Physical description
- C 1p
Please cite as
Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 9092,” accessed on
Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 21


