To J. D. Hooker 30 May [1862]1
Down
May 30th
My dear Hooker
Infinite thanks for 3 grand plants of Melastomas;2 if anything can be safely made out, I have now good opportunity. I saw again today the 2 sets of plants of Heterocentron raised from the two pollens from same flower, & you never could imagine what a marvellous difference in stature.3 Also many thanks for Vanilla:4 it is very different indeed from any orchid which I have seen, & has pollen like Cypripedium(!) & very curious stigma. But oh Lord what will become of my book on Variation:5 I am involved in a multiplicity of experiments.— I have been amusing myself by looking at the small flowers of Viola. If Oliver has had time to study them,6 he will have seen the curious case (as it seems to me) which I have just made clearly out, viz that in these flowers the few pollen-grains are never shed or never leave the anther-cells, but emit long pollen-tubes, which penetrate the stigma. Today I got the anther with the included pollen-grains (now empty) at one end, & a bundle of tubes penetrating the stigmatic tissue at the other end; I got the whole under the microscope without breaking the tubes: I wonder whether the stigma pours some fluid into the anther so as to excite the included grains. It is a rather odd case of correlation that in the double sweet Violet, the little flowers are double; i.e. have a multitude of minute scales representing the petals. What queer little flowers they are.—7
Have you had time to read poor dear Henslow’s life:8 it has interested me for the man’s sake, & what I did not think possible, has even exalted his character in my estimation. But I much fear that the Public will think it dull. It will, however, be useful to any clergyman trying to follow, longo intervallo, Henslow’s footsteps.—
How bothered with visitors & hard worked you are.9
Good Night | Charles Darwin
P.S. Tell Oliver, I think he must by mistake, when I asked him, have opened the ovarium of female Lychnis dioica: anyhow I can find no vestige of ovules—10 Tell him that my fancied dimorphisms, like that of Primula, of Oxalis acetosella is all a confounded mistake; only great variability in length of pistils.—11
I have just looked again at V. canina—the case odder;12 only 2 stamens which embrace the stigma have pollen; the 3 other stamens have no anther-cells & no pollen.— These 2 fertile anthers are of different shape from the 3 sterile others; & the scale representing lower lip is larger & differently shaped from the 4 other scales, representing 4 other petals.—
In V. odorata, (single flower) all 5 stamens produce pollen. But I daresay all this is known.—
Footnotes
Bibliography
Correspondence: The correspondence of Charles Darwin. Edited by Frederick Burkhardt et al. 29 vols to date. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1985–.
‘Dimorphic condition in Primula’: On the two forms, or dimorphic condition, in the species of Primula, and on their remarkable sexual relations. By Charles Darwin. [Read 21 November 1861.] Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society (Botany) 6 (1862): 77–96. [Collected papers 2: 45–63.]
Jenyns, Leonard. 1862. Memoir of the Rev. John Stevens Henslow, late rector of Hitcham, and professor of botany in the University of Cambridge. London: John Van Voorst.
Orchids: On the various contrivances by which British and foreign orchids are fertilised by insects, and on the good effects of intercrossing. By Charles Darwin. London: John Murray. 1862.
Origin: On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. By Charles Darwin. London: John Murray. 1859.
Variation: The variation of animals and plants under domestication. By Charles Darwin. 2 vols. London: John Murray. 1868.
Summary
Has received Melastoma and Vanilla.
Has seen again the two sets of plants of Heterocentron raised from two lots of pollen from same flower – a marvellous difference in stature.
"But oh Lord what will become of my book on variation: I am involved in a multiplicity of experiments."
Observations on Viola.
CD’s fancied dimorphism of Oxalis is all a confounded mistake; only great variability in length of pistils.
Found Henslow’s life [L. Jenyns, Memoir of the Rev. J. S. Henslow (1862)] interesting but fears the public will think it dull.
Letter details
- Letter no.
- DCP-LETT-3575
- From
- Charles Robert Darwin
- To
- Joseph Dalton Hooker
- Sent from
- Down
- Source of text
- DAR 115: 152
- Physical description
- ALS 5pp
Please cite as
Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 3575,” accessed on 26 September 2022, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-3575.xml
Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 10