skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

Search: contains ""

400 Bad Request

Bad Request

Your browser sent a request that this server could not understand.


Apache Server at dcp-public.lib.cam.ac.uk Port 443
Search:
in keywords
30 Items
Page:  1 2  Next

The writing of "Origin"

Summary

From a quiet rural existence at Down in Kent, filled with steady work on his ‘big book’ on the transmutation of species, Darwin was jolted into action in 1858 by the arrival of an unexpected letter (no longer extant) from Alfred Russel Wallace outlining a…

Matches: 16 hits

  • … to choose from the load of curious facts on record.—’ (letter to W. D. Fox, 31 January [1858] ). …
  • … as evidence for what actually occurred in nature (see letter to Asa Gray, 4 April [1858] , and  …
  • … throwing away what you have seen,’ he told Hooker in his letter of 8 [June 1858] , ‘yet I have …
  • … his work was interrupted by the arrival of the now-famous letter from Alfred Russel Wallace, …
  • … selection. Darwin’s shock and dismay is evident in the letter he subsequently wrote to Charles Lyell …
  • … Even his terms now stand as Heads of my Chapters.’ (letter to Charles Lyell, 18 [June 1858] ). …
  • … the writing of this ‘abstract’ continued until March 1859; the resulting volume was published in …
  • … instinct the previous March. By the middle of March 1859, Darwin had finished the last …
  • … upon Lyell for advice (letter to Charles Lyell, 28 March [1859] ). Lyell suggested the firm of …
  • … plan of his book (see letter from Elwin to Murray, 3 May 1859 , and letter to John Murray, 6 …
  • … the forthcoming book (letter to Charles Lyell, 30 March [1859] ). Darwin next considered calling …
  • … and varieties’ (letters to Charles Lyell, 28 March [1859] , and to John Murray, 10 September …
  • … question is whether the rag is worth anything?’ (letter to T. H. Huxley, 2 June [1859] ). But as …
  • … process of natural selection and held out for design. Huxley felt that Darwin’s hypothesis needed to …
  • … that there was only one man in England,’ Darwin wrote to Huxley the morning after he read it, ‘who …
  • … a fresh act of intervention to supply the lacunas w  h . he himself had made’ (letter from Charles …

Darwin in letters, 1858-1859: Origin

Summary

The years 1858 and 1859 were, without doubt, the most momentous of Darwin’s life. From a quiet rural existence filled with steady work on his ‘big book’ on species, he was jolted into action by the arrival of an unexpected letter from Alfred Russel Wallace…

Matches: 16 hits

  • … The years 1858 and 1859 were, without doubt, the most momentous of Darwin’s life. From a quiet …
  • … he was jolted into action by the arrival of an unexpected letter from Alfred Russel Wallace. This …
  • … and prompted the composition and publication, in November 1859, of Darwin’s major treatise  On the …
  • …  exceeded my wildest hopes By the end of 1859, Darwin’s work was being discussed in …
  • … ‘When I was in spirits’, he told Lyell at the end of 1859, ‘I sometimes fancied that my book w  d …
  • … to choose from the load of curious facts on record.—’ ( letter to W. D. Fox, 31 January [1858] ). …
  • … as evidence for what actually occurred in nature ( see letter to Asa Gray, 4 April [1858] , and  …
  • … throwing away what you have seen,’ he told Hooker in his letter of 8 [June 1858] , ‘yet I have …
  • … his work was interrupted by the arrival of the now-famous letter from Alfred Russel Wallace, …
  • … selection. Darwin’s shock and dismay is evident in the letter he subsequently wrote to Charles Lyell …
  • … the writing of this ‘abstract’ continued until March 1859; the resulting volume was published in …
  • … Botanic Gardens at Kew (see Appendix VII). The year 1859 began auspiciously with Darwin …
  • … 1854) ( Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society  15 (1859): xxv). One of the most …
  • … is whether the rag is worth anything?’ ( letter to T. H. Huxley, 2 June [1859] ). But as critical …
  • … process of natural selection and held out for design. Huxley felt that Darwin’s hypothesis needed to …
  • … this Essay & that  you  were the man.’ ( letter to T. H. Huxley, 28 December [1859] ). …

Darwin in letters, 1862: A multiplicity of experiments

Summary

1862 was a particularly productive year for Darwin. This was not only the case in his published output (two botanical papers and a book on the pollination mechanisms of orchids), but more particularly in the extent and breadth of the botanical experiments…

Matches: 17 hits

  • … continued: Darwin’s own works expanded on it, Thomas Henry Huxley gave lectures about it, and Henry …
  • … but really I do think you have a good right to be so’ ( letter from J. D. Hooker, [15 and] 20 …
  • … species. Darwin attempted to dissuade him from this view ( letter to T. H. Huxley, 14 [January 1862 …
  • … & Nicotiana being partially sterile together. He failed. Huxley replied ( letter from T. H. …
  • … The issue arose again when, through November and December, Huxley delivered a series of lectures to …
  • … and pronounced them ‘simply perfect’, but continued ( letter to T. H. Huxley, 18 December [1862] ) …
  • … resigned to their difference of opinion, but complained ( letter to T. H. Huxley, 28 December [1862 …
  • … letters, Darwin, impressed, gave him the commission ( see letter to John Scott, 11 December [1862] …
  • … protégé, telling Hooker: ‘he is no common man’ ( letter to J. D. Hooker, 12 [December 1862] ). …
  • … Towards the end of the year, he wrote to Hooker ( letter to J. D. Hooker, 12 [December 1862] ): …
  • … out of four or five sets of experiments’ ( letter to M. T. Masters, 24 July [1862] ). The …
  • … with ‘good dashes of original reflexions’ ( letter to H. W. Bates, 13 January [1862] ). He warmly …
  • … & admirable papers I ever read in my life’ ( letter to H. W. Bates, 20 November [1862] ). He …
  • … telling him of the need for a second edition ( letter from H. G. Bronn, [before 11 March 1862] ), …
  • … 3/4 hour, night & day’ that saved the boy ( letter to M. T. Masters, 24 July [1862] ). By …
  • … by … particularly active young wolves’ ( letter from T. H. Huxley, 9 October 1862 ). Darwin …
  • … views, though not to natural selection ( see letter from T. H. Huxley, 13 January 1862 ). Darwin …

Darwin in letters, 1874: A turbulent year

Summary

The year 1874 was one of consolidation, reflection, and turmoil for Darwin. He spent the early months working on second editions of Coral reefs and Descent of man; the rest of the year was mostly devoted to further research on insectivorous plants. A…

Matches: 16 hits

  • be done by observation during prolonged intervals’ ( letter to D. T. Gardner, [ c . 27 August
  • pleasures of shooting and collecting beetles ( letter from W. D. Fox, 8 May [1874] ).  Such
  • Andone looks backwards much more than forwards’ ( letter to W. D. Fox, 11 May [1874] ). …
  • was an illusory hope.— I feel very old & helpless’  ( letter to B. J. Sulivan, 6 January [1874] …
  • inferred that he was well from his silence on the matter ( letter from Ernst Haeckel, 26 October
  • in such rubbish’, he confided to Joseph Dalton Hooker ( letter to J. D. Hooker, 18 January [1874] …
  • researcher Frederick William Henry Myers, and Thomas Henry Huxley, who sent a long report to Darwin
  • his, ‘& that he was thus free to perform his antics’ ( letter to T. H. Huxley, 29 January [1874
  • alloweda spirit séanceat his home ( letter from T. G. Appleton, 2 April 1874 ). Back
  • sweetly all the horrid bother of correction’ ( letter to H. E. Litchfield, 21 [March 1874] ). The
  • and disease in the Sandwich Islands (Hawaii; letters from T. N. Staley, 12 February 1874 and
  • additions to  Descent  was an eight-page note written by Huxley with the aim of ending a dispute
  • ape and human brains, he asked for a clarifying note from Huxley (Desmond and Moore 2004, pp. xxxv
  • anatomists; and never mind where it goes’ ( letter from T. H. Huxley, 16 April 1874 ). The
  • conciseness & clearness of your thought’ ( letter from G. H. Darwin, 20 April 1874 ). …
  • the spread of various mental and physical disorders (G. H. Darwin 1873b). In July 1874, an anonymous

Women’s scientific participation

Summary

Observers | Fieldwork | Experimentation | Editors and critics | Assistants Darwin’s correspondence helps bring to light a community of women who participated, often actively and routinely, in the nineteenth-century scientific community. Here is a…

Matches: 24 hits

  • Observers Women: Letter 1194 - Darwin to Whitby, M. A. T., [12 August
  • silkworm breeds, or peculiarities in inheritance. Letter 3787 - Darwin, H. E. to
  • observations of catsinstinctive behaviour. Letter 4258 - Becker, L. E. to Darwin, …
  • to artificially fertilise plants in her garden. Letter 4523 - Wedgwood, L. C. to
  • be made on seeds of Pulmonaria officinalis . Letter 5745 - Barber, M. E. to
  • Expression from her home in South Africa. Letter 6736 - Gray, A. & J. L
  • Expression during a trip to Egypt. Letter 7223 - Darwin to Wedgwood, L. C., …
  • expression of emotion in her pet dog and birds. Letter 5817 - Darwin to Huxley, T. …
  • Letter 6535 - Vaughan Williams , M. S. to Darwin, H. E., [after 14 October 1869] …
  • Letter 9426 - Story-Maskelyne , T. M. to Darwin, [23 April 1874] Thereza
  • buds and flowers. Letter 9616 - Marshall, T. to Darwin, [September 1874] …
  • patience”. Letter 4242 - Hildebrand, F. H. G. to Darwin, [16 July 1863] …
  • Women: Letter 1701 - Morris, M. H. to Prior, R. C. A., [17 June 1855] …
  • Letter 4823  - Wedgwood, L. C. to Darwin, H. E., [May 1865] Darwins niece, Lucy, …
  • Leith Hill Place. Letter 6139  - Doubleday, H. to Darwin, [22 April 1868] …
  • Letter 8168 - Ruck, A. R . to Darwin, H., [20 January 1872] Amy Ruck reports the
  • in a tin box. Letter 9616  - Marshall, Tto Darwin, [September 1874] …
  • Letter 1113 - Darwin to Whitby, M. A. T., [2 September 1847] Darwin questions Mrs. …
  • Letter 2447 - Darwin to Murray, J., [5 April 1859] Darwin asks his publisher, John
  • Letter 2461  - Darwin to Hooker, J. D., [11 May 1859] Darwin expresses anxiety over
  • can understand it. Letter 3896 - Darwin to Huxley, T. H, [before 25 February 1863] …
  • daughter, Henrietta. Letter 4010 - Huxley, T. H. to Darwin, [25 February 1863] …
  • Letter 2475  - Darwin to Hooker, J. D., [2 July 1859] Darwin returns the manuscript of
  • Letter 2501   - Lyell, C. to Darwin, [3 October 1859] Lyell offers praise and

The Lyell–Lubbock dispute

Summary

In May 1865 a dispute arose between John Lubbock and Charles Lyell when Lubbock, in his book Prehistoric times, accused Lyell of plagiarism. The dispute caused great dismay among many of their mutual scientific friends, some of whom took immediate action…

Matches: 24 hits

  • but his views were generally derided. 1  In 1859, Lyell visited several sites in
  • that these were indeed implements of early humans (C. Lyell 1859). In September 1860 he visited
  • species such as the mammoth ( Correspondence vol. 8, letter to Charles Lyell, 4 May [1860] and n. …
  • human race.  In 1861, Lubbock joined Thomas Henry Huxley, Busk, and several other supporters
  • in French, earlier reports written in Danish (Morlot 1859, Forchhammer et al. 18515); Lubbock
  • Galton.   In February 1863, Lubbock received a letter from Lyell, evidently in response
  • for their work in the Brixham cave explorations of 1858 and 1859. 5 Another controversy arose
  • in correspondence with Joseph Dalton Hooker, Asa Gray, and Huxley but he never spoke out publicly
  • about Lyells failure to support him. In April 1863, in a letter to the Athenæum , he discussed a
  • transmutation; he also wrote to Lyell telling him about the letter to the Athenæum . 9
  • 1863b, p. 213).  In May 1864, Lubbock received a letter from Falconer, who reiterated his
  • is by me. Evidently, he then showed the note to Huxley and asked for his opinion on the
  • C. Lyell 1863c that were almost identical. He did not, as Huxley had suggested, send Lyell the text
  • and went on to say that he intended to make a copy of his letter to show to friends. 18 In
  • wrote to Darwin to ask what he thought of the affair ( letter from J. D. Hooker, [2 June 1865] ). …
  • he reiterated his admiration for Lubbocks book ( letter to J. D. Hooker, [4 June 1865] ). A week
  • involvement is the fact that, although he corresponded with Huxley in June and July and had seen
  • resolve the dispute. Lubbock continued to seek advice from Huxley, Hooker, and other X-club friends
  • its appearance in print; first in French, dated Berne, Sept. 1859, in theMémoires de la Société …
  • zoologist M. Claparède had also conversed with me in 1859 on the researches of the best Danish
  • gave me an abstract for my use, in a letter dated December 1859. He referred me chiefly toOversigt
  • Hooker, vol. 14, doc. 1834). 15. Letter from T. H. Huxley, 7 March 1865, in BL MSS ADD
  • and Edinburgh: Williams & Norgate. Lyell, Charles. 1859. On the occurrence of works of
  • vols. London: John Murray. Morlot, Charles Adolphe. 1859. Etudes géologico-archéologiques en

Darwin in letters, 1863: Quarrels at home, honours abroad

Summary

At the start of 1863, Charles Darwin was actively working on the manuscript of The variation of animals and plants under domestication, anticipating with excitement the construction of a hothouse to accommodate his increasingly varied botanical experiments…

Matches: 19 hits

  • that he wasunwell & must write briefly’ ( letter to John Scott, 31 May [1863] ), and in a
  • persevered with his work on Variation until 20 July, his letter-writing dwindled considerably. The
  • Charles Lyell, the respected geologist, and Thomas Henry Huxley, the zoologist and anatomist. Lyell
  • fromsome Quadrumanum animal’, as he put it in a letter to J. D. Hooker of 24[–5] February [1863] …
  • views of human dignity and intelligence, exclaiming to Huxley: ‘I declare I never in my life read
  • circles following the publication of Lyells and Huxleys books. Three years earlier Darwin
  • than  Origin had (see  Correspondence  vol. 8, letter to Charles Lyell, 10 January [1860] ). …
  • … (p. 488). Since the publication of  Origin  in 1859, new evidence that early humans had coexisted
  • earlier in the century. Lyells  Antiquity of man  and Huxleys  Evidence as to mans place in
  • from animals like the woolly mammoth and cave bear ( see letter from Jacques Boucher de Perthes, 23
  • would sway many towards a new way of thinking, while Huxleys book would scare them off ( see
  • Antiquity of man  of the ongoing debate between Owen, Huxley, and others concerning the comparative
  • on this subject seems to get rarer & rarer’ ( letter to H. W. Bates, 18 April [1863] ), …
  • for the Natural History Review  ( see letter to H. W. Bates, 12 January [1863] ). Darwin added
  • to J. D. Hooker, [9 May 1863] , and memorandum from G. H. Darwin, [before 11 May 1863]) . …
  • at the end of 1862, and published as a book in early 1863 (T. H. Huxley 1863a). Though Darwin was
  • natural sterility of species, when crossed’ ( letter to T. H. Huxley, 10 [January 1863] ). He
  • both self-pollination and cross-pollination ( letter to P. H. Gosse, 2 June [1863] ). The
  • and Lyells  Antiquity of man  ( see letter from T. H. Huxley, 25 February 1863 , and letter

Darwin in letters, 1860: Answering critics

Summary

On 7 January 1860, John Murray published the second edition of Darwin’s Origin of species, printing off another 3000 copies to satisfy the demands of an audience that surprised both the publisher and the author. It wasn't long, however, before ‘the…

Matches: 19 hits

  • learn that the book was on sale even in railway stations ( letter to Charles Lyell, 14 January
  • the book, thinking that it would be nice easy reading.’ ( letter to Asa Gray, 22 May [1860] ). …
  • some of those whose support he most wanted: Thomas Henry Huxley, William Benjamin Carpenter, and
  • he told Hooker, did not at all concern his main argument ( letter to J. D. Hooker, 3 January [1860] …
  • his theory would have beenutterly  smashed’ ( letter to T. H. Huxley, 3 July [1860] ). (A
  • from right principles of scientific investigation.—’ ( letter to J. S. Henslow, 8 May [1860] ). …
  • a theory solely by explaining an ample lot of facts.’ ( letter to Asa Gray, 18 February [1860] ). …
  • phenomena it comes in time to be admitted as real.’ ( letter to C. J. F. Bunbury, 9 February [1860] …
  • natural selection did not necessarily lead to progression ( letter to Charles Lyell, 18 [and 19
  • yet understand the concept of natural selection. Even Huxley, an avowed supporter, proved a
  • inter se ,’ Darwins theory would remain unproven (T. H. Huxley 1860a). Darwin had long
  • animal groups could give rise to new species, Darwin found Huxleys lecture irritating and
  • naturalists because more accustomed to reasoning.’ ( letter to A. R. Wallace, 18 May 1860 ). …
  • two physiologists, and five botanists ( see letter to J. D. Hooker, 3 March [1860] ). Others, like
  • tail, whenever I gaze at it, makes me sick!’ ( letter to Asa Gray, 3 April [1860] ). By the
  • the geographical distribution of species ( see letter from T. H. Huxley, 6 August 1860 ). But Baer
  • earlier sessions, including the Thursday meeting at which Huxley and Owenhad a furious battle over
  • … ‘for half an hour’, ridiculing Darwinbadly & Huxley savagely’. Huxley rose in response and
  • tried to answer the Bishop in such an assembly,’ he told Huxley; nonetheless he believed thatthis

Origin

Summary

Darwin’s most famous work, Origin, had an inauspicious beginning. It grew out of his wish to establish priority for the species theory he had spent over twenty years researching. Darwin never intended to write Origin, and had resisted suggestions in 1856…

Matches: 14 hits

  • make a large-sized pamphlet. ’ On the 4 October, in a letter to T. C. Eyton explaining his change
  • from trusted readers like Hooker, Lyell, and Thomas Henry Huxley. He chided himself for having asked
  • across tropics ’. When Hookers essay was published in 1859, it was one of the first publications
  • as by far the most capable judge in Europe. ’ By April 1859, he was able to tell Wallace that ‘ …
  • Abstractwould not be finished until around April 1859. But this was an optimistic estimate. …
  • of favoured races” ’, he told Lyell. On 31 March 1859, Darwin wrote to Murray describing his work
  • deciding. ‘My volume cannot be mere light reading,’ h explained, ‘ & some parts must be dry
  • his friend George Frederick Pollock. The former, in a long letter to Murray, believed that Darwin
  • if they had my materials; but that is no help. ’ Even Huxleys pointing to a flaw in Darwins
  • the work of correcting proofs continued over the summer of 1859, Darwin had to take the water cure
  • never shirked a difficulty’, he told Lyell on 20 September 1859, ‘ I am foolishly anxious for your
  • of Science meeting held in Aberdeen from 14 to 21 September 1859. Darwin was confident that in time
  • in reply, ‘ that if ever I lived to see Lyell, yourself & Huxley come round, partly by my Book
  • and negative, to his work flowed in. By early December 1859, he admitted that he needed tothink

Darwin in letters, 1865: Delays and disappointments

Summary

The year was marked by three deaths of personal significance to Darwin: Hugh Falconer, a friend and supporter; Robert FitzRoy, captain of the Beagle; and William Jackson Hooker, director of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, and father of Darwin’s friend…

Matches: 25 hits

  • intended for publication in Variation , to Thomas Henry Huxley for evaluation, and persuaded his
  • The death of Hugh Falconer Darwins first letter to Hooker of 1865 suggests that the family
  • having all the Boys at home: they make the house jolly’ ( letter to J. D. Hooker, 7 January [1865] …
  • had failed to include among the grounds of the award ( see letter from Hugh Falconer to Erasmus
  • his letters to Darwin, and Darwin responded warmly: ‘Your letter is by far the grandest eulogium
  • may well rest content that I have not laboured in vain’ ( letter to Hugh Falconer, 6 January [1865] …
  • always a most kind friend to me. So the world goes.—’ ( letter to J. D. Hooker, 2 February [1865] …
  • for our griefs & pains: these alone are unalloyed’ ( letter from J. D. Hooker, 3 February 1865
  • gas.— Sic transit gloria mundi, with a vengeance’ ( letter to J. D. Hooker, 9 February [1865] ). …
  • added, ‘I know it is folly & nonsense to try anyone’ ( letter to J. D. Hooker, 7 January [1865] …
  • ineffective, and Darwin had given it up by early July ( see letter to J. D. Hooker, [10 July 1865] …
  • of anything, & that almost exclusively bread & meat’ ( letter to Asa Gray, 15 August [1865] …
  • the improvement to Joness diet ( see letter to T. H. Huxley, 4 October [1865] ). It was not until
  • of species; for if he is correct, we certainly have what Huxley calls new physiological species
  • health had been particularly bad, Darwin sent Thomas Henry Huxley a fair copy of a manuscript in
  • hypothesis of pangenesis’, as it later became, to Huxleys judgment with some trepidation. ‘It is a
  • can hang on it a good many groups of facts.’ ( Letter to T. H. Huxley, 27 May [1865] .) The
  • to Darwin of this hypothesis is obvious from his letter to Huxley, despite his apparent modesty, and
  • was to all appearances his usual method of working. He asked Huxley not for detailed criticism, but
  • from Darwins letter to him of 12 July [1865] . Huxley had evidently pointed out some similarity
  • of the only clue at present accessibleand dont give the Philistines more chances of blaspheming
  • humans (see  Correspondence  vol. 10, letter from J. H. Balfour, 14 January 1862 ). According
  • a trying year. In January he had influenza ( letter from F. H. Hooker, [27 January 1865] ); before
  • on the affair, to her mother, ends, ‘I wish people werent so foolish’;. In November, Darwin and
  • been sent the proof-sheets before publication. Letters after 1859 throw light on Darwins continuing

Darwin in letters, 1869: Forward on all fronts

Summary

At the start of 1869, Darwin was hard at work making changes and additions for a fifth edition of  Origin. He may have resented the interruption to his work on sexual selection and human evolution, but he spent forty-six days on the task. Much of the…

Matches: 18 hits

  • … & I am sick of correcting’ ( Correspondence  vol. 16, letter to W. D. Fox, 12 December [1868
  • Well it is a beginning, & that is something’ ( letter to J. D. Hooker, [22 January 1869] ). …
  • made any blunders, as is very likely to be the case’ ( letter to J. D. Hooker, 13 January 1869 ). …
  • than I now see is possible or probable’ (see also letter to A. R. Wallace, 22 January [1869] , …
  • is strengthened by the facts in distribution’ ( letter to James Croll, 31 January [1869] ). Darwin
  • tropical species using Crolls theory. In the same letter to Croll, Darwin had expressed
  • a very long period  before  the Cambrian formation’ ( letter to James Croll31 January [1869] …
  • would no doubt do if we had proper data to go by, but dont think we have got that yet’ ( letter
  • to see Thomsons work challenged by both Thomas Henry Huxley and WallaceHe confided to Huxley, ‘I
  • been less deferential towards [Thomson]’ ( letter to T. H. Huxley, 19 March [1869] ). …
  • and fossil discoveries in Patagonia and Wales ( letter from T. H. Huxley, 7 May 1869 , letter
  • part at Darwins most outspoken British supporter, Thomas Huxley, whose addressThe physical basis
  • … “punctum saliensof the whole meeting was decidedly Huxleys answer to D r  M c Cann. He
  • man’ ( letter from J. D. Hooker7 September 1869 ). Huxley playfully groused that as usual
  • greater fools of themselves than they did’ ( letter from T. H. Huxley, 28 September 1869 ). …
  • into whichI do not care to follow him’ ( letter from T. H. Farrer, 9 October 1869 ). Farrer
  • Freedom and Will and High Design—’ (letter from T. H. Farrer, 13 October 1869). …
  • to set foot on summit of a mountain.—’ ( letter to T. H. Huxley, 9 July [1869] ).  Earlier

Darwin in letters, 1871: An emptying nest

Summary

The year 1871 was an extremely busy and productive one for Darwin, with the publication in February of his long-awaited book on human evolution, Descent of man. The other main preoccupation of the year was the preparation of his manuscript on expression.…

Matches: 17 hits

  • do to talk about it, which no doubt promotes the sale’ ( letter from J. D. Hooker, 26 March 1871 ) …
  • to her liking, ‘to keep in memory of the book’ ( letter to H. E. Darwin, 20 March 1871 ). …
  • and had forsaken his lunch and dinner in order to read it ( letter from James Crichton-Browne, 19
  • they believe to be the truth, whether pleasant or not’ (letter from W. W. Reade, 21 February 1871). …
  • and OldhamThey club together to buy them’ ( letter from W. B. Dawkins, 23 February 1871 ). …
  • ones n th . ancestor lived between tide-marks!’ ( letter from T. H. Huxley, 20 February 1871 ). …
  • habits, furnished with a tail and pointed ears”  (letter from Asa Gray, 14 April 1871) …
  • … ‘will-powerand the heavy use of their arms and legs ( letter from C. L. Bernays, 25 February 1871
  • in order to make it darker than the hair on his head ( letter from W. B. Tegetmeier, [before 25
  • Mivart. An expert on primates and a former protegé of Huxleys, Mivart had written several articles
  • Agassiz, Abraham Dee Bartlett, Albert Günther, George Busk, T. H. Huxley, Osbert Salvin, and William
  • … , published the following year. Darwin was also pleased that Huxley took up the defence in an
  • and misquoting of both Darwin and Catholic theology (T. H. Huxley 1871). Huxley judged Mivart to be
  • … ‘accursed Popery and fear for his soul’ ( letter from T. H. Huxley and H. A. Huxley, 20 September
  • who wasas good as twice refined gold’ ( letter to H. E. Litchfield, 4 September [1871] ). …
  • up to the last with quinine & sherry’ ( letter from H. E. Litchfield to Charles and Emma Darwin
  • themselves with the reflection thatTruth doesnt die’ ( letter from T. H. Huxley, 28 September

Forms of flowers

Summary

Darwin’s book The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species, published in 1877, investigated the structural differences in the sexual organs of flowers of the same species. It drew on and expanded five articles Darwin had published on the…

Matches: 5 hits

  • … of the same species would give rise to fertile progeny (T. H. Huxley 1860, pp.562-5). He later …
  • … inter se) have ever been produced from a common stock’ (T. H. Huxley 1860, p. 198). In Origin , p …
  • … on hybridity in the new edition of Origin . He encouraged Huxley to read it, noting, ‘ Asa Gray …
  • … (p. 82) and clarified the meaning to Fritz Müller in a letter in September 1866, ‘ What I meant in …
  • … than in the short-styled form ’, Darwin annotated this letter, wondering, ‘Would it be worth while …

What did Darwin believe?

Summary

What did Darwin really believe about God? the Christian revelation? the implications of his theory of evolution for religious faith? These questions were asked again and again in the years following the publication of Origin of species (1859). They are…

Matches: 17 hits

  • years following the publication of  Origin of species  (1859). They are still asked today by
  • often seeking direction for their own. Mary Booles letter In December 1866 Darwin
  • of Science & the promises of religion. See the letter Boole, like a number
  • meeting point should still be far off. See the letter In his response to Boole
  • feeling. But he does not venture into such territory in this letter to a stranger. Emma
  • description of my state of mind. See the letter In this letter, Darwin is
  • … & I cannot help being open with you. See the letter We know from Darwins
  • means so in eternity. There is a marked tension in Emmas letter between reason and feeling, and
  • as a guide to moral conduct, as in his remarks on Pauls letter to Galatians, chapter six: ‘read
  • ongoing discussion and mutual concern for many years. Huxley, Wallace, and Haeckel The
  • be asserted by one of Darwins leading proponents, Thomas Huxley. We can see Huxley pleading his
  • … … the first fashionable view. Letter from T. H. Huxley to H. A. Heathorn, October 1847. …
  • Kingsley, who had written to him following the death of Huxleys first son, Noel, aged 5. Kingsley
  • many years. ‘The most sacred act of a mans life,’ Huxley wrote, ‘is to say and to feel, “I believe
  • and follow the facts without rest or regard for risk.’ Huxley compared this tothe Christian
  • of Charles Darwin  (London: Collins). Barrett, Paul H. et al ed. 1987Charles Darwins
  • 1855. Huxley, Thomas Henry. Zoologist. Huxley, T. H.,  “Darwin on the Origin of Species

The "wicked book": Origin at 157

Summary

Origin is 157 years old.  (Probably) the most famous book in science was published on 24 November 1859.  To celebrate we have uploaded hundreds of new images of letters, bringing the total number you can look at here to over 9000 representing more than…

Matches: 2 hits

  • … the most famous book in science was published on 24 November 1859.  To celebrate we have uploaded …
  • … to Darwin’s.  Others, like Hugh Falconer , couldn't wait to buy 'the wicked book' …

Darwin in letters, 1875: Pulling strings

Summary

‘I am getting sick of insectivorous plants’, Darwin confessed in January 1875. He had worked on the subject intermittently since 1859, and had been steadily engaged on a book manuscript for nine months; January also saw the conclusion of a bitter dispute…

Matches: 21 hits

  • … Darwin had worked on the subject intermittently since 1859, and had been steadily engaged on a book …
  • … On 8 January , he told Hooker: ‘I will write a savage letter & that will do me some good, if I …
  • … codes of conduct and communication in scientific society. Huxley chose journalism, depicting the …
  • … to the Editor … Poor Murray shuddered again & again’ ( letter from J. D. Hooker, 16 January …
  • … Instead of supporting her, he worked closely with Huxley and John Burdon Sanderson to draft an …
  • … appoint a Royal Commission to advise on future legislation. Huxley served on the commission, which …
  • … , p. 183). Darwin learned of Klein’s testimony from Huxley on 30 October 1875 : ‘I declare to you …
  • … at what you say about Klein,’ Darwin replied to Huxley on 1 November . ‘I am very glad he is a …
  • … offered to pay the costs for printing an additional 250 ( letter to John Murray, 3 May 1875 ). …
  • … & bless the day That ever you were born (letter from E. F. Lubbock, [after 2 …
  • … that the originally red half has become wholly white’ ( letter from G. J. Romanes, [before 4 …
  • … pp. 188–90). He drew attention to this discussion in a letter to George Rolleston, remarking on 2 …
  • … Darwin wrote, ‘I beg ten thousand pardon & more’ ( letter to Francis Darwin, [ c . February …
  • … signed himself, ‘Your affect son … the proofmaniac’ ( letter from Francis Darwin, 1 and 2 May [1875 …
  • … both critical and reverential. On 16 July he received a letter from an advocate of women’s …
  • … her presentation copy of Insectivorous plants ( letter to D. F. Nevill, 15 July [1875] ). Such …
  • … of my house within the short time I can talk to anyone’ ( letter to John Lubbock, 3 May [1875] ). …
  • … career, having studied under George Rolleston at Oxford and Huxley at South Kensington, with …
  • … and had agreed to see him at Down with Thiselton-Dyer ( letter to W. T. Thiselton-Dyer, 7 July 1875 …
  • … lay of hair in eyelashes and on arms, a typically lengthy letter full of personal observations, …
  • … examination it was pronounced to be of a ‘high type’ ( letter from Woodward Emery, 17 September …

Darwin in letters,1866: Survival of the fittest

Summary

The year 1866 began well for Charles Darwin, as his health, after several years of illness, was now considerably improved. In February, Darwin received a request from his publisher, John Murray, for a new edition of  Origin. Darwin got the fourth…

Matches: 19 hits

  • Pound foolish, Penurious, Pragmatical Prigs’ ( letter from J. D. Hooker, [29 December 1866] ). But
  • able to write easy work for about 1½ hours every day’ ( letter to H. B. Jones, 3 January [1866] ). …
  • once daily to make the chemistry go on better’ ( letter from H. B. Jones, 10 February [1866] ). …
  • see you out with our beagles before the season is over’ ( letter from John Lubbock, 4 August 1866
  • vigour into scientific work, remarking to Fox, ‘I dont believe in your theory of moderate mental
  • production of which Tegetmeier had agreed to supervise ( letter to W. B. Tegetmeier, 16 January
  • submitted a preliminary sketch of pangenesis to Thomas Henry Huxley in 1865 (see Correspondence vol. …
  • ofDomestic Animals & Cult. Plantsto Printers’ ( letter to J. D. Hooker, 24 December [1866] …
  • hybridisers had been a subject of debate between Darwin and Huxley, who had asserted the importance
  • Shortly after the new edition was published, Darwin wrote to Huxley, ‘do read the Chapt. on
  • good deal I think, & have come to more definite views’ ( letter to T. H. Huxley, 22 December
  • interview with Mogg’, she wrote in May, ‘He didnt scold me at all about fusca & lutea & we
  • come & pay a morning call but that most likely you wdnt see him & he said he shd be
  • It is rather horrible to have another self fertiliser, isnt it?’), as well as the role that she and
  • clearly admired parts of the book, but he expressed to Huxley and others certain reservations and
  • weak in his Greek, is something dreadful’ ( letter to T. H. Huxley, 22 December [1866] ). …
  • who was sympathetic to Darwin and had previously translated Huxleys  Mans place in nature , was
  • as athinking pump’: ‘I read aloud your simile of H. Spencer to a thinking pump, & it was
  • prosecution on 2 November 1866. Spencer enclosed a letter by Huxley to the  Pall Mall Gazette , …

Darwin's in letters, 1873: Animal or vegetable?

Summary

Having laboured for nearly five years on human evolution, sexual selection, and the expression of emotions, Darwin was able to devote 1873 almost exclusively to his beloved plants. He resumed work on the digestive powers of sundews and Venus fly traps, and…

Matches: 24 hits

  • roles in creating a private memorial fund for Thomas Henry Huxley, and in efforts to alleviate the
  • I omitted to observe, which I ought to have observed” ( letter to J. D. Hooker, 12 January [1873] …
  • work your wicked will on itroot leaf & branch!” ( letter from J. D. Hooker, 12 January 1873 ) …
  • parts of the flower would become modified & correlated” ( letter to T. H. Farrer, 14 August
  • it again, “for Heaven knows when it will be ready” ( letter to John Murray, 4 May [1873] ). …
  • we take notes and take tracings of their burrows” ( letter from Francis Darwin, 14 August [1873] ) …
  • in importance; and if so more places will be created” ( letter to E. A. Darwin, 20 September 1873
  • our unfortunate family being fit for continuous work” ( letter from E. A. Darwin, 25 September
  • on any point; for I knew my own ignorance before hand” ( letter to George Cupples, 28 April [1873] …
  • … “he would fly at the Emprs throat like a bulldog” ( letter from L. M. Forster to H. E. Litchfield, …
  • force & truth of the great principle of inheritance!” ( letter to F. S. B. F. de Chaumont, 3
  • the heavy breathing that accompanied sexual intercourse? (letter from ?, [1873?]). The Scottish
  • with up lines; & sadness & decay with the reverse—” ( letter from William Main, 2 April
  • with the advance of civilisation and good breeding ( letter from Henry Reeks, 3 March 1873 ). …
  • have never felt an inclination to have a second dose” ( letter from Robert Swinhoe, 26 March 1873
  • of an orbital one produces snapping of the jaws” ( letter from James Crichton-Browne, 16 April 1873
  • could be transmitted to its offspring ( letter from J. T. Moggridge, 1 February 1873 ). …
  • a large sum in his own name. Together with Thomas Henry Huxley, Darwin drafted an appeal to
  • it would offend his father ( enclosure to letter from T. H. Huxley, 3 December 1873 ).  In
  • conversation with Emma Darwin, and Darwin began to sound out Huxleys friends on the matter. The
  • from J. D. Hooker, [7 April 1873] ). A group of Huxleys close friends, including Hooker, …
  • happiness to us to the last day of our lives” ( letter to T. H. Huxley, 23 April 1873 ). Huxley
  • been without energy & without hope” ( letter from T. H. Huxley, 24 April 1873 ). He accepted
  • to starve sweat & purge it away” ( letter from G. H. Darwin, [1 October 1873] ). He also

Darwin in letters, 1861: Gaining allies

Summary

The year 1861 marked an important change in the direction of Darwin’s work. He had weathered the storm that followed the publication of Origin, and felt cautiously optimistic about the ultimate acceptance of his ideas. The letters from this year provide an…

Matches: 20 hits

  • will do me & Natural Selection, right good service’ ( letter to Asa Gray, 267 Februrary [1861] …
  • … ‘barometerof scientific opinion, Charles Lyell ( see letter to Charles Lyell, 20 July [1861] ). …
  • selection could not bedirectly proved’ ( see second letter to J. D. Hooker, 23 [April 1861] ). …
  • wasthe only one proper to such a subject’ ( letter from Henry Fawcett, 16 July [1861] ). Mill in
  • or against some view if it is to be of any service!’ ( letter to Henry Fawcett, 18 September [1861] …
  • chapter on the imperfection of the geological record ( see letter to George Maw, 19 July [1861] ). …
  • he planned to reportat a favourable opportunity’ ( letter from Joseph Leidy, 4 March [1861] ). …
  • laboratory where Nature manufactures her new species’ ( letter from H. W. Bates, 28 March [1861] ) …
  • study of natural history was evident. He told Darwin in his letter of [1 December] 1861: …
  • by insect enemies from which the other set is free’ ( letter from H. W. Bates, 30 September 1861 ) …
  • be avery valuable contribution to Nat. History.—’ ( letter to H. W. Bates, 4 April [1861] ). He
  • causes &c’, andMonkeys,—our poor cousins.—’ ( letter to H. W. Bates, 3 December [1861] ). …
  • obtaininglarge distributionfor the work ( letter to H. W. Bates, 25 September [1861] ). …
  • with the controversy between Richard Owen and Thomas Henry Huxley concerning the anatomical
  • that their brain structures were strikingly dissimilar. Huxley pointed out, publicly and acerbicly
  • vol. 9, Appendix VIII).) For his part, Darwin enjoyed Huxleys sparring with Owen, though
  • he had nursed a growing animosity toward the man; as he told Huxley at the beginning of the year, he
  • Owen wouldnever be friends again’ ( letter to T. H. Huxley, 3 January [1861] ). Friends
  • units, and, for a breif period after their formation in 1859, membership carried with it great
  • expertise. His old and established friendsHooker, Gray, Huxley, and Lyellcontinued to support his

Darwin in letters, 1856-1857: the 'Big Book'

Summary

In May 1856, Darwin began writing up his 'species sketch’ in earnest. During this period, his working life was completely dominated by the preparation of his 'Big Book', which was to be called Natural selection. Using letters are the main…

Matches: 16 hits

  • … all of it found its way into  On the origin of species  (1859). His letters are often the only …
  • … an illustration of how selection might work in nature ( letter from Charles Lyell, 1–2 May 1856, n. …
  • … the real structure of varieties’, he remarked to Hooker ( letter to J. D. Hooker, 8 September [1856 …
  • … ‘& I mean to make my Book as perfect as ever I can.’ ( letter to W. D. Fox, 8 February [1857] …
  • … plants, he asked Asa Gray, vary in the United States ( letter to Asa Gray, 2 May 1856 )? What …
  • … plants pretty effectually’ complained Darwin in 1857 ( letter to J. D. Hooker, [2 May 1857] ). …
  • … John Lubbock that his method of calculation was wrong ( letter to John Lubbock, 14 July [1857] ). …
  • … on this problem from many different quarters, turning to Huxley to ask him whether there were any …
  • … which the bird had naturally eaten have grown well.’ ( letter to J. D. Hooker, 10 December [1856] …
  • … he wrote to Syms Covington in New South Wales ( letter to Syms Covington, 9 March 1856 ). …
  • … theory concerning the dynamics of glacial flow, with which Huxley was closely involved. Darwin …
  • … his work on species and the preparation of his manuscript ( letter to A. R. Wallace, 1 May 1857 ) …
  • … a preliminary sketch was apparently first made in a letter written by Lyell from London on 1–2 May …
  • … and went up to London to see Lyell to discuss it further ( letter to Charles Lyell, 3 May [1856] ) …
  • … so far, and not embrace the whole Lamarckian doctrine.’ ( letter from Charles Lyell, 1–2 May 1856, …
  • … in his views to explain them in explicit detail in a long letter to Asa Gray ( letter to Asa Gray, …
Page:  1 2  Next