From J. J. Weir 24 March 1868
6 Haddo Villas | Blackheath SE
24 Mch 1868
My Dear Sir
I hope you will clearly understand that it is by no means necessary to reply to my letters, but on the contrary I have endeavoured, knowing how valuable your time is, so to word them that no answer is needed.—
I have by no means arrived at many facts regarding Wallaces theory, accounting for the bright colors of caterpillars by supposing that birds are warned that such species are of bad flavor, still all last Summer I made continual experiments.—1
Up to the present time the birds experimented on have refused all conspicuous larvæ & have eaten greedily “all species of nocturnal or retiring habits & whose colors assimilated them to their food plants.—
Vanessa Io & V Urticæ both species whose caterpillars are most conspicuous on Nettles were decidedly refused, not even regarded although crawling for hours about the aviary.—2
Their metallic pupæ were likewise allowed to remain day after day unheeded by the birds.—
The larvæ of the
Garden Tiger, Arctia Caja
Small Eggar, Eriogaster lanestris
Gold Tail, Porthesia auriflua,
Vapourer, Orgyia antiqua
Ermine, Spilosoma menthastri3
were all refused by the birds although left in the Aviary for days.—
In order to ascertain whether these caterpillars were rejected on account of flavor I took a large number of young Menthastri (say 100) and placed in the Aviary, their character was then undeveloped & the larvæ were but inch long, most of the birds paid no attention to them, although they were crawling about on a leaf, but two or three birds seeing them move came up to the leaf and tasted one or two, but at once turned away leaving the remainder unmolested.—4
The actions of the birds shewed plainly, by shaking the head and cleaning the beak that an unsavoury morsel had been taken into the mouth.
The ♀ of Orgyia antiqua in the imago state never leaves the cocoon but as it deposits its eggs, it is often nearly an inch in length with the abdomen very much distended with ova, it is conspicuous on palings & seems a nice fat mouthful for an insectivorous bird, but by the birds in my aviary it was universally refused.—5
It is to be noted that my birds were very tame & were constantly on the lookout for insects to be thrown to them, they would take without hesitation Woodlice, Centipedes, Millipedes Geodephagous Beetles, Cockroaches (Blattæ), Weevils (Curculionidæ & with avidity Spiders.—6
The latter much surprizes me, but they like nothing better, but in nature the spiders seem protected, perhaps by their webs?—
Yours very truly | J Jenner Weir
C Darwin Esqr.
CD annotations
Footnotes
Bibliography
Correspondence: The correspondence of Charles Darwin. Edited by Frederick Burkhardt et al. 29 vols to date. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1985–.
OED: The Oxford English dictionary. Being a corrected re-issue with an introduction, supplement and bibliography of a new English dictionary. Edited by James A. H. Murray, et al. 12 vols. and supplement. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1970. A supplement to the Oxford English dictionary. 4 vols. Edited by R. W. Burchfield. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1972–86. The Oxford English dictionary. 2d edition. 20 vols. Prepared by J. A. Simpson and E. S. C. Weiner. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1989. Oxford English dictionary additional series. 3 vols. Edited by John Simpson et al. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1993–7.
Summary
Experiments to test Wallace’s theory that brightly coloured caterpillars are rejected by birds. [See Descent 1: 417.]
Letter details
- Letter no.
- DCP-LETT-6046
- From
- John Jenner Weir
- To
- Charles Robert Darwin
- Sent from
- Blackheath
- Source of text
- DAR 84.1: 65–8
- Physical description
- ALS 8pp †
Please cite as
Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 6046,” accessed on 9 November 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-6046.xml
Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 16