skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

From Anthony Rich   4 June 1880

Chappell Croft, | Heene, Worthing.

June 4. 1880

My dear Mr. Darwin,

The sight of your hand-writing was an agreeable surprise to me yesterday,—for it is always an honour for me to receive a letter from you, and a pleasure to read your friendly talk and hear the news about all your family.1 With a single exception all seems at present to be marked with a note of white chalk, and so far you may fairly be congratulated by all well wishers; and I can truly regret, because I well know what ill health means, that your son George should be the exception. If he is not a bad sailor, I should think that a summer’s cruise in a fine yatch with so kind and distinguished a friend as Sir W. Thompson would be the very best prescription that he could have made up for him.2 It is doubtless hard for a man of great ability to be forced against his will into a state of mental inactivity; but is it not best to yield willingly when resistance would be useless, or possibly prejudicial? Please to give him my salutations and cordial good wishes when you see or write to him.—

This morning’s Paper brings me the announcement that Sir J. Lubbock has been elected Member for the University of London. That will give you pleasure I feel certain; as he is a neighbour of yours, and probably a personal friend. When I heard that he had lost his seat for Maidstone it at once struck me that the result would be received with grief at Down.—3 À propos of election gossip I may mention that the new member for Mary-lebone is an old tenant of No. 24. on our Sacred Mount—the Hill of Corn—4 He does not occupy the premises himself, and never did, but sublets them in flats for a consideration which ought to be considerable to make such a transaction worth any body’s while!

The title of your new book sounds as if it would come within the comprehension of such an ignoramus as myself, and I shall watch the announcement of its forthcoming with assiduous attention.5 I find that I get duller of intellect from year to year; and less and less able to fix my mind closely down upon any subject so as to retain a consecutive understanding of the matter I am reading about, if that happens to be greatly specialized or involves close or subtle argument. For this advancing years are, no doubt, partly to blame—but a dull torpid liver must add largely to that grievance, so that I find myself shirking books which require thoughtful reading, and looking out; much more than I used to do, for amusement than for instruction. But I anticipate both the one and the others in that book about the Movement of Plants. Ah! that reminds me that I shall see before long several strings of blossom bursting forth on the Philadelphus you gave me last autumn.6 Both of the plants survived the cold winter and dry spring—quite bravely.

I see that the Critics speak in flattering terms of your portrait at the Exhibition—the one I conclude for which you were sitting at this time last year.7 It must be a satisfaction for yourself as well as for your people to know that you have not been deformed nor caricatured by the artist who will hand down your features to the knowledge of coming generations.—

Those Wilberforces must have been, more or less, every one of them men of mark, to have sprouted out of the Clapham Sect into what they became. I used to meet one of them in Italy in my youth who afterwards joined the R.C. persuasion. He was then what we used to call “a Saint”—as was the lady whose house he frequented, a very great friend of mine, a most agreeable, and very worldly lady. She had small feet of which she was exceedingly proud, and I won her heart offhand at the tomb of Cecilia Metella on the Appian Way by offering her my lemon coloured kid gloves to put over her boots when she complained that she could not pass over the grass because it was too wet.8 When any of her pious lady friends wanted to convert me she used to say “its of no use your talking to Mr. Rich— I never can get him to be serious on the subject— he’s hardened in sin”!—

Oh! if my kid glove days had not been dead and buried long, long ago, I should not want nor wait for two invitations to Down!9 Nothing could give me greater pleasure than to go and visit you at home; but the years that I have spent in a sort of monastic seclusion from social intercourse, if they do not render me unfit for its enjoyment, do make it increasingly difficult, I had almost said impossible, for me to resume the ordinary duties of life. I find too that my hearing is becoming somewhat defective; which renders me unable to follow the conversation going on when several people are talking together— It is now a year and a half since I have been in London; I get shy and nervous at having to go alone and mind my own business; and scarcely anything short of compulsion can get me to move away from my own domicile. If I only had a thorough good body servant to travel with me and take all the trouble off my hands, I should go about much more than I now do. But then, such a man, if found at my time of life, would probably become, or try to become, himself the master—and might get to be a very domineering one.— I do not suppose that there is any chance of your passing this way on your return from Basset.10 Indeed I am far from sure that the very thought of such a thing may not appear to be somewhat conceited on my part—. Pardon! One half of my household has been disabled of late, but appears now to be convalescent. She goes to town on Wednesday next to see doctor, and as I hope for the last time—11

That attack on you in the Athenaeum I did not see. You & the prime Minister may boast of having been in your day the best abused men in England—and both can look down with the pride of nobly earned triumphs upon the utter discomfiture of their opponents.12 What satisfaction can be greater either intellectually or morally?—

Please to pass round my regards and respects to all your circle, and especially to the ladies, and believe me to be | Dear Mr. Darwin | Very sincerely yours | Anthony Rich

Footnotes

CD’s letter to Rich has not been found.
George Howard Darwin had been ill; see letter from G. H. Darwin, 28 May 1880 and n. 10. He had planned to visit William Thomson in Glasgow in May 1879 (see Correspondence vol. 27, letter from G. H. Darwin, 10 May 1879 and n. 5). Evidently, George did not go on the cruise in June 1880 (letter from James Thomson to G. H. Darwin, 25 June 1880 (University of Glasgow Special Collections, MS Kelvin T135)).
John Lubbock lived in Down and was Liberal MP for Maidstone, Kent, from 1870 to 1880, and for London University from 1880 to 1900 (ODNB; see also The Times, 3 June 1880, p. 11).
Daniel Grant was the newly elected Liberal MP for Marylebone in 1880 (Craig ed. 1989). Twenty-four Cornhill, London was one of the properties that Rich left to CD in his will; see Correspondence vol. 26, letter from Anthony Rich, 10 December 1878.
CD published Movement in plants on 6 November 1880 (Freeman 1977).
CD had sent Rich a plant of Philadelphus (the genus of mock-orange), which flowers from June to July and is very frost hardy; see Correspondence vol. 27, letter from Anthony Rich, 28 December 1879.
In June 1879, CD sat for his portrait painted by William Blake Richmond and commissioned by the Cambridge Philosophical Society to commemorate the honorary doctorate of laws (LLD) awarded to him by the University of Cambridge in 1877; see Correspondence vol. 27, letter to John Fiske, 10 June 1879, and Browne 2002, p. 451. It was exhibited at the Grosvenor Gallery, London; see also The Times, 1 May 1880, p. 8. The portrait now hangs in the Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge. See Correspondence vol. 27, frontispiece.
In the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, William Wilberforce (1759–1833) was at the centre of the Clapham Sect, a circle of friends that provided emotional and practical support for an anti-slave-trade campaign and various religious initiatives (ODNB). His sons William, Robert Isaac, and Henry William Wilberforce converted to Roman Catholicism. The lady has not been identified. The tomb of Cecilia Metella is on the Via Appia Antica, three miles outside Rome (Imperium Romanum, Mausoleo di Cecilia Metella, https://www.romanoimpero.com/2010/01/mausoleo-di-cecilia-metella.html (accessed 15 March 2019)).
Rich had visited Down on 18 June 1879 (Emma Darwin’s diary (DAR 242)).
CD’s eldest son, William Erasmus Darwin, lived in Bassett, near Southampton, with his wife, Sara.
In 1881, Rich lived with a cook and housekeeper, Harriet Hardwick, and a parlourmaid, Hannah Bagley (Census returns of England and Wales 1881 (The National Archives: Public Record Office RG11/1118/20/31)).
CD was attacked in a letter by Samuel Butler published in the Athenæum, 31 January 1880; see letter to H. E. Litchfield, 1 February [1880], enclosure 1. The prime minister was William Ewart Gladstone.

Bibliography

Browne, Janet. 2002. Charles Darwin. The power of place. Volume II of a biography. London: Pimlico.

Craig, Frederick Walter Scott, ed. 1989. British parliamentary election results: 1832–1885. 2d edition. Aldershot, Hampshire: Parliamentary Research Services.

Freeman, Richard Broke. 1977. The works of Charles Darwin: an annotated bibliographical handlist. 2d edition. Folkestone, Kent: William Dawson & Sons. Hamden, Conn.: Archon Books, Shoe String Press.

Movement in plants: The power of movement in plants. By Charles Darwin. Assisted by Francis Darwin. London: John Murray. 1880.

ODNB: Oxford dictionary of national biography: from the earliest times to the year 2000. (Revised edition.) Edited by H. C. G. Matthew and Brian Harrison. 60 vols. and index. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2004.

Summary

CD’s portrait at exhibition is praised by critics. CD and the Prime Minister may boast of having been in their day "the best abused men in England".

Letter details

Letter no.
DCP-LETT-12620
From
Anthony Rich
To
Charles Robert Darwin
Sent from
Worthing
Source of text
DAR 176: 142
Physical description
ALS 8pp

Please cite as

Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 12620,” accessed on 18 April 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-12620.xml

letter