skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

DCP-LETT-9804

To T. H. Huxley   6 January 1875

Down, | Beckenham, Kent. | Railway Station | Orpington. S.E.R.

Jan. 6th/75/

My dear Huxley

I have just received the Academy & read with absolute delight your article. What a man you are: I am convinced that all the writers in England could not have written such an article. How grandly you have defended me from the charge of duplicity. You have also greatly honoured George.1 You have indeed been a true friend to me.

Yours affectly. | Ch Darwin

Though contrary to your advice, I cannot make up my mind not to write to Mr Mivart & tell him with the utmost plainness what I think of his conduct.2 There will then be no doubt, if we ever meet, that I shall cut him dead.—

What will his feelings be when he reads your article! I wish the Bishop was alive.—3

Footnotes

1
In his review of Ernst Haeckel’s Anthropogenie (Haeckel 1874) in the Academy, 2 January 1875, pp. 16–17, Thomas Henry Huxley had criticised the insinuations of the ‘anonymous reviewer’ (St George Jackson Mivart) against George Howard Darwin in the Quarterly Review ([Mivart] 1874, p. 70).
2
In December 1874, Huxley had written to Mivart about his attack on George, but had advised CD not to do anything unless Mivart took the initiative in writing to CD or Joseph Dalton Hooker (Correspondence vol. 22, letter from T. H. Huxley, 23 December 1874). See also ibid., Appendix V.
3
Samuel Wilberforce, the bishop of Oxford, died in 1873. In his article in the Academy, Huxley referred scathingly to an anonymous review of Origin in the Quarterly Review; the review was in fact by Wilberforce and had been suspected to be by Wilberforce almost from the first by CD ([Wilberforce] 1860; see Correspondence vol. 8 and the Wellesley index).

Letter details

Letter no.
DCP-LETT-9804
From
Darwin, C. R.
To
Huxley, T. H.
Sent from
Down
Source of text
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine Archives (Huxley 5: 313)
Physical description
3pp

Summary

Thanks THH for his article in the Academy and his defence of CD and G. H. Darwin against Mivart. Still thinks he should write plainly to Mivart.

Please cite as

Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 9804,” accessed on 13 February 2016, http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/DCP-LETT-9804

letter