skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

From Hermann Müller   19 May 1873

Lippstadt

19. 5. 73.

My dear Sir

You have very much rejoiced me by sending me your book on Expression.1 Reading this book immediately after its appearance I have admired anew your inimitable sagacity and exactness in observing such facts that every one has overlooked as insignificant and which in your hands spread a plenty of light over the most mysterious districts of human understanding. I have been ravished by the evident interpretation you have given of the expression of affects in animals and men, and I have anew been convinced that also psychology will make progress only by leaning on observations of the activity of the soul of animals.— I am very glad to possess this wonderful work from your own hand.

My brother has indeed fertilised in different plants some flowers with strictly their own pollen and other ones by other flowers on the same plant. But in the most cases viz. with Bignonia (Bot. Zeit. 1868. Nr. 39), Tabernaemontana echinata (Bot. Z. 1870. p. 274.), and Abutilon (Jenaische Zeitschrift) he found those plants which are sterile with their own pollen, also sterile with the pollen from distinct flowers on the same plant. Only in Eschscholtzia californica (Bot. Zeit. 1869. Nr. 14) which he found sterile with its own pollen, he was successful in some degree in fertilising it with pollen from a distinct flower on the same plant.2

In order to acquaint you as quickly as possible with the details I send you spare copies of my brothers trials, except Bot. Zeit. 1870. p. 274., of which I do not possess any spare copy.

The number of those plants which exist in two forms, (one more remarkable, more richly visited by insects and never fertilising itself, the other one unsightly, rarely visited by insects but constantly fertilising itself) is certainly much greater than it would appear according to my book.3 I have examined just now the wild Viola tricolor (var. arvensis) and I have found that this plant also constantly fertilises itself (I add a drawing of it)   I suppose that Mr. Bennett in the article May 15, 1873 of the “Nature”, you allude to, has published the same fact, and I would be very glad to become acquainted with this article   I will ask the editor of the Nature for it.4

Certainly I shall cultivate several of those plants which exist in the two forms alluded to and I shall try with them in the manner announced by you.5

At present I continue ardently to examine the flowers of our wild plants and to research for their fertilisers. Viola tricolor, Myosurus minimus, Calla palustris and Myosotis versicolor are those,6 the examination of which has given the most interesting results. In Myosurus the enorm growth of the cone of pistils effects no other thing but the regular self fertilisation of the numerous stigmas by the small number of anthers

Calla palustris is fertilised, like Arum maculatum by very small Dipterous insects, but not by one species but by very different ones; also various Coleoptera are attracted by the white spatha but without finding a recompense. This plant is proterogyne like Arum maculatum, but not so completely.7 I cultivate now specimens in my room, in order to decide if they are fertile by self-fertilisation

In Myosotis versicolor the flower opens before having got its blue colour and its ful greatness, by this the style overlooks the anthers affixed to the corolla, and if insects visit now the flower they fertilise it by pollen of other flowers. But a few hours after the opening of the flower the corolla grows in such a degree that the anthers surround closely the stigma and powder it with own pollen.

My brother is very well. During the last years he has spent his leisure time in observing the mimicry of butterflies and the natural history of termites. On the latter subject he will publish some essays, the copies of which I will send you as soon as I receive them. Intending to investigate the genealogy of bees more closely than I have done in my “application of the Darwinian theory to bees” I have begged my brother for sending me specimens of Brasilian bees, and gratifying to my wishes he has not only sent me many Brasilian forms of bees but also acquainted me with a plenty of facts respecting the economy of them.8

My dear Sir | yours sincerely | H. Müller

diagram

This form of Viola tricolor fertilises itself inevitably, the pollen falling from itself out of the anthers and arriving directly in the opening of the stigma-head, which in flowers perfectly opened is always found fulfilled with pollen grains

The specimens which I have cultivated in my room and guarded during the evolution of the flowers from the visits of insects are quite fertile—will come to maturity in several days.

CD annotations

1.1 You have … hand. 1.9] crossed blue crayon
2.3 Tabernaemontana echinata] underl red crayon
2.5 also … plant. 2.6] double scored pencil
4.1 The number … of them. 9.8] crossed pencil
5.1 Certainly … by you. 5.2] double scored pencil
Top of letter: ‘I thank you for very interesting letter in many ways | Nature | Brother | Difference of other flowers on same plant, & strictly self’ blue crayon; ‘[Riley]blue crayon del blue crayon; ‘Kerner’9 pencil
Alongside diagram: ‘H. Muller’ pencil
End of letter: ‘There is paper by A. W. Bennett Nature 1873 May 15th p. 49. on the Fert of Wild Pansy (V. arvensis) & includes fertilisation by Thrips’ ink10

CD note:

p. 134. perfect M. S.

Digitalis ♂ flower crossed by own pollen & by that from other flowers on same plant— in watch glasses no difference in quantity, by eye but by weight self seeds heavier

crossed gr self

7.65 : 7.7

p. 67 perfect M. S.— analyse evidence about seeds of Ipomœa

p 150. Origanum *vulgare— long cultivated [interl] rather more seeds produced by plants from same [stock] than by self fertilisation

p. 209 Perfect M. S. Dianthus no marked [interl] difference in number of seeds produced by crossing flowers on same plant & self fertilisation11 [‘Lobelia fulgens I believe same fact’ pencil del pencil; ‘Victoria Lily’ ink del ink]

Footnotes

CD probably sent Müller a copy of Expression in return for Müller’s gift of H. Müller 1873 (see letter from Hermann Müller, 28 February 1873).
CD had evidently asked Müller the same set of questions he asked Hildebrand (see letter to Friedrich Hildebrand, 15 May 1873) in a now missing letter. Müller refers to Eschscholzia californica and to the work of his brother, Fritz Müller (see F. Müller 1868, 1870, 1872–3, and 1869). CD drew on Fritz Müller’s work in Cross and self fertilisation. There are copies of F. Müller 1868 and 1872–3 in the Darwin Pamphlet Collection–CUL. Tabernaemontana echinata is now T. siphilitica.
Müller mentioned thirteen specific plants or genera exhibiting these two forms in his book on the fertilisation of flowers by means of insects (H. Müller 1873), including some species of Viola (ibid., p. 146). CD’s annotated copy is in the Darwin Library–CUL (see Marginalia 1: 610–12).
In his article on the fertilisation of Viola arvensis, the field pansy (Bennett 1873a), Alfred William Bennett had pointed out the inconclusiveness of Müller’s observations (H. Müller 1873, p. 118). Norman Lockyer was the editor of Nature; Bennett was the biological subeditor.
CD possibly mentioned his manner of cultivation in his missing letter (see n. 2, above), or Müller may refer to the experimental method described by CD in ‘Fertilisation of Leschenaultia’ in the Gardeners’ Chronicle (see Correspondence vol. 7, letter to Gardeners’ Chronicle, [before 13 November 1858]).
Viola tricolor is heartsease or wild pansy; Myosurus minimus is mousetail (of the buttercup family); Calla palustris is bog arum; Myosotis versicolor is a synonym of M. verna, spring forget-me-not,.
The flowers of Arum maculatum, the wild arum, are encased in a sheath or spatha before their expansion. In proterogynous plants the female reproductive organs (pistils) become fertile before the male ones (stamens). Much of the material Müller worked on after the publication of H. Müller 1873 was added to the English translation of 1883 (see H. Müller 1883, p. vii), including a description of Calla palustris (ibid., p. 565).
Müller’s brother, Fritz Müller, lived in the Itajaí valley, Brazil. For Müller’s work on the genealogy of bees, see H. Müller 1872.
These are evidently notes for CD’s reply, which has not been found, but see the letter from Hermann Müller, 27 May 1873. The reference is probably to Anton Kerner von Marilaun’s work on the features of floral morphology that govern plant fertilisation (Kerner von Marilaun 1873).
CD evidently sent a copy of Bennett 1873a (see n. 4, above) to Müller; see letter from Hermann Müller, 27 May 1873.
The page numbers refer to the manuscript pages of CD’s draft of the first ten chapters of Cross and self fertilisation (DAR 2 and DAR 3).

Bibliography

Correspondence: The correspondence of Charles Darwin. Edited by Frederick Burkhardt et al. 29 vols to date. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1985–.

Cross and self fertilisation: The effects of cross and self fertilisation in the vegetable kingdom. By Charles Darwin. London: John Murray. 1876.

Expression: The expression of the emotions in man and animals. By Charles Darwin. London: John Murray. 1872.

‘Fertilisation of Leschenaultia’. By Charles Darwin. Gardeners’ Chronicle and Agricultural Gazette, 9 September 1871, p. 1166. [Shorter publications, pp. 371–3.]

Marginalia: Charles Darwin’s marginalia. Edited by Mario A. Di Gregorio with the assistance of Nicholas W. Gill. Vol. 1. New York and London: Garland Publishing. 1990.

Müller, Hermann. 1873. Die Befruchtung der Blumen durch Insekten und die gegenseitigen Anpassungen beider. Ein Beitrag zur Erkenntniss des ursächlichen Zusammenhanges in der organischen Natur. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.

Müller, Hermann. 1883a. The fertilisation of flowers. Translated and edited by D’Arcy W. Thompson. London: Macmillan and Co.

Summary

Praises Expression.

Reports on Fritz Müller’s observations of cross- and self-fertilisation. HM will cultivate the two forms [i.e., mainly self-fertilised and mainly cross-fertilised] in the way CD has described.

He continues his observation of wild flowers. Encloses drawing of Viola tricolor with notes on its self-fertility.

Letter details

Letter no.
DCP-LETT-8907
From
Heinrich Ludwig Hermann (Hermann) Müller
To
Charles Robert Darwin
Sent from
Lippstadt
Source of text
DAR 76: B181–2, DAR 77: 139
Physical description
ALS 3pp †, CD note, sketch †

Please cite as

Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 8907,” accessed on 24 April 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-8907.xml

Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 21

letter