Darwin Correspondence Project

Totness. Devon.

May. 12/40

My dear Darwin

Not having any books of tables with me here and not being able to procure such a thing in This Town I was on the point of writing to you to say I could not send you what you wanted, till I sent to Falmouth for my tables, when fortunately I found some of my old work in my desk which gave the Dip for different distances and as that increases as the square of the distance increases I was able to proportion for the distances you wanted, and this led me to a very easy rule for finding it for any distance which as it may be useful to you I will give you: it is merely to multiply the dip for one mile by the square of the number of miles you want it for— not having tables I cannot calculate the dip for one mile to any very great nicety but the mean of those dips I have worked, gives 0,758 of a foot for a mile of distance, and that will be near enough for your distances as it it is so near as not to make a foot error in 15 miles distance— in case I may not have explained the way of working it I will give you an example. required Dip for 16. miles 16 Dip = 1 mile ,758 16 Square. 16 — 256 — — 96 4548 16 3790 — 1516 256 square —— — 194,048 feet — —— —— required dip for 8 miles & half 8,5 ,758 dip for one mile 8,5 72,25 square of 812 — — 425 3790 680 1516 — 1516 square 72,25 5306 — ——— 54,76550 feet ——— This gives 194 feet for 16 miles, and 55 feet for 812 miles, you will find the dip increase so rapidly as the distance gets above 3 or 4 miles that you will have to proportion for every tenth of a mile and I think you will find this the easiest way as it dispenses with logarithims, as I had many worked that might be useful to you I have added them to those to you wished to have.

With respect to refraction —I cannot now give you the amount with any certainty—but it will be very trifling & for short distances almost nothing, the usual allowance is 112 of the distance. thus at 12 miles it would be 1 minute and the height subtended by an angle of 1 minute at 12 miles distance would be the amount of refraction, which would have to be subtracted from the dip for 12 miles that is the point you saw Level would be actually below your level. You might do away with refraction if you wished by Elevating your level to the amount, thus of distance 12 miles you could elevate the level 1 minute above the true level & you would then see the point truly on a level with you, and for 6 miles 12 a minute and so on, but all terrestial refractions are liable to great error from the constant changes I believe 112 of the distance is about the avarage allowance— directly I get my Books from Falmouth I will work the refraction for each mile on this principle, which you will merely have to subtract from the dip, for the true dip—if you prefer this to altering the level: & perhaps you may not have a level that can be set to any angle as you can a Theodolite—

Now I have scribbled all this I am not at all satisfied that it is plain I am a poor hand at explaining things but if you cannot make it out write and ask more questions—

I am very sorry to hear the account of your health but I hope you will give up all work and rusticate till you are quite restored— recollect everything is inferior to health and all the success & fame in the world will never compensate for a weak stomach and its attendant evils I still feel that tho I am better now. report says a promotion will come out at the Queens Birthday, this makes me anxious tho I think, I cannot be passed over if it does come out. if I am I shall care for nothing more in connection with the service— in fact now I am almost sick of it I cannot bear to think of our voyage. tho that is not caused by Deferred promotion; it is by unmerited reproaches where I least should have expected them—but I must not [ touch] on this.

my wife joins me in remembrances to M^rs Darwin | God Bless you & Believe me your sincere friend | B J Sulivan

PS | You directed you letter to Falmouth which I have left this two months—

I have called the curvature Dip though I think it is not a right term