Alterations to the woodcuts of poultry for Variation.
<two lines excised>
My dear Sir.
I am glad that you like the cuts generally,—with respect to the alterations; the fantail I am certain can be altered so as to remove the effect to which you object
There will be no difficulty in reducing the blocks of the cocks heads. The Hamburgh was
a genuine portrait of a bird that I obtained for M
The name of <two lines excised>
The bantam feathers that you returned were from a golden sebright or laced hen and
consequently would have the saffron colour— You allude to the original account
If the skulls of the polish in the last number of the poultry book would be of any use to your new volume I could easily supply you with electrotypes to print from
Many thanks for your kindness in correcting the references, irrespective altogether of its being of great benefit to me personally, I think it is desirable, as references to a volume that cannot be seen, are not of any great value
I enclose the feathers of the cross bred wild Gallus— I took them myself from the living bird in the Zoological Gardens some years since—. The neck (hackle) feathers are very curious—
I have no doubt of being able to send you the amended proofs of the blocks in a few days at the farthest.— I have been staying in your drysoiled and sunny county for a few days and am better in consequence
I have just looked for the Gallus varius? cross bred feathers and find also some of a
half bred Sonnerat—which I enclose, thinking possibly you may like to see
them; they also were taken by myself from the living bird, but I have no doubt you saw
I am afraid I weary you with my hobby, and will conclude | Yours very truly | W B Tegetmeier
- f1 5180.f1The date is established by the relationship between this letter and the letter to W. B. Tegetmeier, 4 August .
- f2 5180.f2See letter to W. B. Tegetmeier, 4 August .
- f3 5180.f3The reference is to Luke Wells. See letter to W. B. Tegetmeier, 4 August , n. 8.
- f4 5180.f4In his letter of 4 August , CD had asked Tegetmeier for the name of the artist, Luke Wells, who had drawn the pigeon and fowl specimens for Variation.
- f5 5180.f5Tegetmeier refers to Edward Hewitt and to Hewitt 1864. See letter to W. B. Tegetmeier, 4 August  and n. 9.
- f6 5180.f6Illustrations of two skulls, one from a golden-spangled Polish hen, the other from a silver-spangled Polish cock, were published in The poultry book (Tegetmeier 1867, p. 174). Tegetmeier had written a short paper on the skulls of Polish fowl (Tegetmeier 1856).
- f7 5180.f7Tegetmeier had asked CD to change the references in Variation from an earlier and incomplete edition of The poultry book to his own edition (Tegetmeier 1867). See letter from W. B. Tegetmeier, 2 August 1866 and n. 5.
- f8 5180.f8In his discussion of reversion in Variation, CD described the neck-hackles and tail-feathers of a hybrid between the common fowl and Gallus varius, received from Tegetmeier, as transversely striped with dark metallic blue and grey, `a character which could not have been derived from either immediate parent' (Variation 2: 40).
- f9 5180.f9In Variation, CD described the feathers of hybrids raised in the Zoological Gardens in Regent's Park, London, between a male Gallus sonneratii and a red game-hen, noting that the feathers exhibited the character of those of G. sonneratii, but with much smaller horny laminae (Variation 1: 234 n. 13). CD remarked that G. sonneratii had once been thought to be the ancestral stock of all domestic varieties, but that numerous crossing experiments made at the Zoological Gardens between G. sonneratii and other breeds had resulted in offspring that were almost entirely infertile. On the basis of this and other evidence, CD concluded that the species was not the parent of any domestic breed (Variation 1: 233--4). The crossing experiments had been overseen by Samuel James Augustus Salter. CD cited Salter's paper on the subject, published in the Natural History Review (S. J. A. Salter 1863; see Variation 1: 234 n. 15). For more on CD's interest in the bird, see Correspondence vol. 13, letter to W. B. Tegetmeier, 27 February  and n. 3.