Welcomes ARW's paper on pigeons ["On the pigeons of the Malay Archipelago", Ibis 1 (1865): 365–400].
Influence of monkeys on distribution of pigeons and parrots.
Asks ARW to explain a passage in his paper on Malayan Papilionidae [Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond. 25 (1866): 1–71] on how dimorphic forms are produced. CD knows of varieties "that will not blend or intermix", but which produce offspring quite like either parent.
ARW's remarks on geographical distribution in Celebes "will give a cold shudder to the immutable naturalists".
Presses ARW to work on his travel journal.
Down. | Bromley. | Kent. S.E.
Jan 22. 1866
My dear Wallace
I thank you for your paper on Pigeons, which interested me, as every thing that you
write does. Who w
But I have had a still higher satisfaction; for I finished yesterday your paper in
Linn. Trans. It is admirably done. I cannot conceive that the most
firm believer in Species c
I have been particularly struck with your remarks on Dimorphism; but I cannot quite
understand one point (p. 22) & sh
How can one female form be selected & the intermediate forms die out, without also the other extreme form also dying out from not having the advantages of the first selected form; for as I understand, both female forms occur on the same Island. I quite agree with your distinction between dimorphic forms & varieties; but I doubt whether your criterion of dimorphic forms not producing intermediate offspring will suffice; for I know of a good many varieties which must be so called, that will not blend or intermix, but produce offspring quite like either parent.
I have been particularly struck with your remarks on Geog. Distrib. in
Celebes. It is impossible that any thing c
And now I am going to ask a question which you will not like. How does
Believe me dear Wallace | yours very sincerely | Ch. Darwin
- f1 4982.f1The reference is to A. R. Wallace 1865. A lightly annotated copy is in the Darwin Archive--CUL (DAR 133: 11).
- f2 4982.f2CD marked the passage in which Wallace noted that the largest populations of pigeons, and of parrots, occurred in a part of the Malay archipelago from which monkeys and squirrels were absent (A. R. Wallace 1865, p. 366; see also ML 1: 265). Wallace suggested that the birds consumed fruits that formed part of the diets of these mammals; he also noted the monkeys' habits of destroying eggs and young birds (A. R. Wallace 1865, p. 366).
- f3 4982.f3The reference is to A. R. Wallace 1864b, a paper on variation and geographical distribution as illustrated by butterflies of the family Papilionidae in the Malayan region. CD was aware of its theme through the summary printed in the Reader in 1864; however, the paper was not published in full until 1865. CD's unbound, annotated, copy is in the Darwin Archive--CUL. For CD's earlier favourable impressions of its content, see Correspondence vol. 12, letter to A. R. Wallace, 28 [May 1864] and n. 4. CD referred to the content of A. R. Wallace 1864b in considering taxonomic distinctions between variable forms, local forms, geographical races or subspecies, and true species in Origin 4th ed., pp. 53--4; CD also referred to Wallace's work on polymorphic butterflies in the chapter on pangenesis in Variation 2: 399--400. See also Descent, chapter 11.
- f4 4982.f4The passage to which CD refers concerns Wallace's interpretation of the origins of dimorphism and polymorphism in Papilio (A. R. Wallace 1864b, p. 22). In observing wing patterns in P. memnon, Wallace had noted three different forms of female, two of which occurred in Java. One form (plate 1, fig. 4, in A. R. Wallace 1864b) was a mimic of P. coon. Wallace argued that such polymorphic variants resulted from natural selection and conferred various advantages on females in particular, since, being slower than males, they were more vulnerable to predation. Wallace wrote that natural selection thus explained the development of the differently camouflaged wing colours and patterns in female forms, as well as the phenomenon of mimicry. In his own copy of A. R. Wallace 1864b, CD wrote on page 22: `just like neuters'. See also A. R. Wallace 1905, 1: 401--3.
- f5 4982.f5Wallace urged that it was important to distinguish between varieties, which he defined as producing intermediate offspring when crossed, and dimorphic forms, the progeny of which he claimed would resemble one parent (A. R. Wallace 1864b, p. 10). However, CD had earlier written of varieties producing offspring that were not intermediate but resembled one parent (Origin, pp. 273--5). CD described this phenomenon in greater detail in Variation 2: 92--4.
- f6 4982.f6Compared with other islands of the archipelago, Celebes had many more species of Papilionidae that were unique to it. Celebes also had 3 unique species of mammals, 5 unique species of birds and 190 unique hymenopterous species. Furthermore, Wallace observed that members of the Papilionidae on Celebes exhibited certain common characteristics that distinguished them from their counterparts on other islands. Wallace used this information to argue for the mutability of species and against the notion that all species had been created exactly as and where they were found (A. R. Wallace 1864b, pp. 30--2).
- f7 4982.f7Four months earlier, CD had enquired about progress on Wallace's `journal' (Correspondence vol. 13, letter to A. R. Wallace, 22 September  and n. 3). After his return from Malaya in 1862, Wallace spent five years organising his collections and writing articles. It was not until 1867 that he began in earnest to write The Malay Archipelego, his most popular book; it was published in 1869 (A. R. Wallace 1905, 1: 385--408). There is an annotated copy inscribed by the author in the Darwin Library--CUL (see Marginalia 1: 840--2), and the first volume bears a printed dedication testifying to Wallace's personal friendship for CD and to his `deep admiration for his genius and works'.