Thanks for paper ["Über die Entwicklungstheorie Darwins", Amtl. Ber. Versamml. Dtsch. Naturforsch. Aerzte 38 (1863): 17–30]. Delighted EH confirms his views. Many in England afraid to express views openly.
Down. | Bromley. | Kent. S.E.
Mar 9. 1864
Dear & Respected Sir
You must permit me to thank you sincerely for the present of your paper & for the Stettin Newspaper. I am delighted that so distinguished a Naturalist should confirm & expound my views, and I can clearly see that you are one of the few who clearly understand Natural Selection.
I feel sure that you do good service by boldly expressing how far you agree with me.
Many men in this country & elsewhere really go nearly or quite as far as I do on the modification of Species, but are afraid openly to express such views. I have been particularly struck & interested by your remarks on the individual variability of Sapphirina. This sentence will be remembered by me & quoted hereafter.
With sincere respect I remain dear Sir | yours very faithfully | Charles Darwin
- f1 4422.f1Haeckel 1864a, an article on marine zooplankton. There is an annotated copy in the Darwin Pamphlet Collection--CUL.
- f2 4422.f2Haeckel sent an article from the Neue Stettiner Zeitung, 20 September 1863, entitled `38 Versammlung deutscher Naturforscher und Aerzte' (Thirty-eighth assembly of German scientists and physicians). The article included a report of a speech of Haeckel's that presented CD's theory for a general audience; the speech was published later in 1863 (see Haeckel 1863 and letter to Ernst Haeckel, 21 November ). CD's annotated copy of the Stettin newspaper article is in DAR 226.1: 273; his copy of Haeckel 1863 is in the Darwin Pamphlet Collection--CUL.
- f3 4422.f3The article in Neue Stettiner Zeitung, 20 September 1863 (see n. 2, above), reported that, in his lecture, Haeckel discussed CD's theory of descent; CD triple-scored a passage that noted CD's appropriation of Georges Cuvier's empirical method, and his 1859 explanation in Origin of natural selection and the struggle for survival. The triple-scored passage also included Haeckel's discussion of the significance of both heredity and variation to CD's theory. See Nyhart 1995, pp. 129--30. See also n. 4, below.
- f4 4422.f4In his article on marine zooplankton, Haeckel discussed the genus Sapphirina, and included the following statement (Haeckel 1864a, p. 101), which CD triple-scored and annotated with the comment `good':
Gerade diejenigen Charaktere, welche man hauptsächlich zur Unterscheidung der verschiedenen Sapphirinen--Arten mit Recht benutzt, … haben mir bei Vergleichung zahlreicher Individuen gezeigt, dass sie keineswegs unabänderlich sind, sondern zahlreiche feine individuelle Abänderungen erkennen lassen. [Especially those characters that are chiefly and quite rightly used to distinguish between the different species of Sapphirina … have shown me, when comparing numerous individuals, that they are by no means constant, but exhibit numerous subtle individual variations.]This statement followed a lengthy endorsement of CD's theory of natural selection, including the notion that varieties could be viewed as incipient species; Haeckel argued that crustaceans (the class to which Sapphirina belong) were particularly suited to provide proof of the theory of descent owing to the striking variation of their hard shells. Although a specific reference to Haeckel's statement has not been found in CD's publications, see CD's more general reference to Haeckel's work on descent in the sixth edition of Origin, p. 381.