Thanks GM for a curious lily.
Recommends some papers on coal.
Gives his opinion on the importance of forming theories if one is to be a good and original observer.
Down. | Bromley. | Kent. S.E.
My dear Sir
I am much obliged for the curious Lily: I do not think it comes under my case, for I suppose it is not capable of propagation by bulbs.—
Almost the best papers I have ever read on Coal are some lately published in late numbers of Sillimans American Journal by Lesquereux.— They would be worth your reading & you will like them all the better, as they give the ``Origin of Species'' a few little unpleasant kicks.—
I have the pleasure of knowing M
My dear Sir | Yours sincerely | C. Darwin
- f1 4018.f1The year is established by the relationship between this letter and the letter from George Maw, 25 February 1863.
- f2 4018.f2With his letter of 25 February 1863, George Maw enclosed a specimen of Lilium candidum. CD did not consider it a case of bud-variation because `modifications which arise through bud-variation can generally be propagated . . . by grafting, budding, cuttings, bulbs, &c., and occasionally even by seed' (Variation, 1: 373), and this was not the case with the aberrant flowers of L. candidum.
- f3 4018.f3Joseph Dalton Hooker visited CD at Down House on 22 March 1863 (see letter from J. D. Hooker, [24 March 1863]).
- f4 4018.f4CD refers to Maw's theory of the deposition of coal (see letters from George Maw, 19 February 1863 and 25 February 1863).
- f5 4018.f5Lesquereux 1859--63. The Swiss bryologist and palaeontologist Leo Lesquereux sent CD the second and third parts of his seven-part series of articles on the coal formations of the United States, published in the American Journal of Science and Arts, founded and edited by Benjamin Silliman. The annotated copies are in the Darwin Pamphlet Collection--CUL.
- f6 4018.f6Maw had published a review of Origin ([Maw] 1861) in which he made a number of criticisms that CD thought were `capitally & very originally' put (see Correspondence vol. 9, letter to George Maw, 19 July ). Lesquereux had argued (Lesquereux 1859--63, pt 3, pp. 380--1) that the coal formations of North America did not provide evidence of evolutionary change in plant species.
- f7 4018.f7See letter from William Duppa Crotch, 25 January 1861 (Correspondence vol. 9).