skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

From William Alexander Wooler   5 July 1862

Halliwell | Heighington | Darlington

5th. July 62

Dear Sir

In reading your very interesting work on “Fertilization of orchids you will I am sure excuse me in offering an opinion contra to that which you express in reference to the oppening of flowers—1 From some experiment I made some years ago my impression is that when the anthers arise from the petals that the amputation of part of the petals effects the development of the pollen and as we well know that fertilization is followed by decay of the flower I fancy there is considerable connection between the flower & the production of the pollen & seed   I state this with defference as it needs much & careful attention &c before an opinion is stated; for we know how much we have all had to unlearn from mear fances having been stated so positively that they for a while have stoped further observations—being taken as authoritive—

If I am right then there would be an analogy between the vegetable & animal kingdom—

Nature taking so much & beautifll provision for the fertilization of the orchids yet seems to work vastly to no purpose when she produces so many 1000s of seeds but yet these form so extremely few plants—2 This may indicate that like many other objects of nature they are in the slow progress of passing away— My notion of inter breeding is as Mr Jonas Webb with his sheep3 & Booths &c &c, with the short horns4 that within certain limits when there are certain strengths of constitution &c &c without any defect of healthy action that inter breeding combines the strength & other desired properties in the offspring but I quite think that it is a very small limit that this inter breeding can be carried without increasing some tendancy to deteriotion—5

My orange hose in hose polyanthus plants planted together have produced flowering seedlings this year as good hose in hose as the parent plant but of a lighter yellow colour— also the pollens fertilizing common polyanthus have produced some few good hose-in-hose the seedling varying in colour from yellow to that of the seed bearing plant— also the orange hose in hose fertilized by a large course & dark polyanthus (for the purpose of marking its effect upon the progeny) has resulted in some seedlings without any appearance of hose in hose but some hose in hose one of which the calyx is as perfectly changed as the mother plant but the colour & form of the flower almost precisely like the plant used as the father.6

I have also some seedlings from a cowslip which I fertilized with pollen from the polyanthus & altho some of the seedlings come cowslip some have come coloured but only a little enlarged in size of flower—7 I had not however planted them out of the seed place & therefore they not only flowered poorly but many did not do so at all

I met a man who has asses & mules to carry coals from Potto in Yorkshire up the Cleveland Hills & think he might have some knowledge of these dorsal marks with the bars across the legs of horses8   I learnt from him that he knew a bay pony which often breeding a mule bred ponies & these latter had the line along the back and the bars across the legs— I have sent a few observations to the field on this subject9 & the fact appears to me to present that the variation of species may be produced by this influence—left of the male of a different species upon the female— I have many young Ducks pure Aylesbury ducks & muscovy drakes but next year I intend breeding first from the aylesbury ducks & muscovy drake & then breeding from the same ducks with an aylsbury drake, to see if the other progeny of these ducks the products of eggs obtained after the intercourse with the muscovy vary from the pure aylesbury—and to what extent this influence may have upon the descent of these ducks

The recent work upon the horse by the Editor of the field10 points out that the Americal trotting breed is a pure bred English racer only the taste & ⁠⟨⁠the⁠⟩⁠ adaptation of the Country made trotting races preferable to the galloping ones of this country & therefore selection to breed for trotting was followed & has produced so much a superior trotting breed11 Norfolk was well known for a certain breed of trotters & this arose from that County being a great breeder of poultry for the London market which ⁠⟨⁠it⁠⟩⁠ was desirable to deliver fresh & thus the practice of sending it up in vans ⁠⟨⁠&c⁠⟩⁠ drawn by trotting horses begetting a want for trotters and they were thus produced

—The Editor of the field also in his work upon the dog gives product of the dogs bred between the Grey Hound & bull dog with the descendants12

I shall I hope give more minute particulars of the results of my polyanthus in the Journal of Horticulture shortly.13 I am strongly inclined to concur with you in your paper upon the fertilization of the poly⁠⟨⁠anthus⁠⟩⁠14 and did intend to have ⁠⟨⁠carried⁠⟩⁠ out some experiments this ye⁠⟨⁠ar⁠⟩⁠ for altho I am in wonderfully productive cowslip locality yet it is a little too high for my other objects & I am looking out for an estate to build upon for myself—& I am afraid I could not carefully pursue such experiments15   In my cowslip seedlings some have come quite as cowslips altho the plant was grown in the garden & may have been impregnated from pollen from the fields— This plant is strongly endowed with an idiosyncrasy which may ⁠⟨⁠make⁠⟩⁠ it not such a ready seeder if shaded by net— I would prefer that a plant should be obtained with a large ball just coming into flower from the Lowlands taken to a warm muck in the hills & then made the object of the experiments as the cowslip grows better upon our hills but are much later in flowering & so would be free from any interference from other plants growing perhaps within a radius of miles & in early spring bees &c are not likely to come from the warm shelter of the low lying lands to the cold & windy hills—

I fear I tire you so beg to remain Yours truly | W Woo⁠⟨⁠ler⁠⟩⁠

C Darwin Esq | am FRS

CD annotations

Verso of last page: ‘Fert & seeding of Orchids | Cross fert | Petals | Pony | Aylesbury Ducks | Polyanthus [above del ’Polyanthus‘] experiments | I have reported many   I think I sent you a copy— Beaton did not [illeg] my paper’16 pencil

Footnotes

CD discussed the ‘uses of the petals and sepals’ in Orchids, pp. 339–43; the exact reference has not been identified.
CD described the vast superabundance of seed in orchid species in Orchids, pp. 344–6.
Jonas Webb of Babraham, Cambridgeshire, was a renowned breeder of pedigree livestock. The celebrated Babraham flock of short-woolled sheep had been maintained by selective interbreeding between five families within the flock (Gardeners’ Chronicle and Agricultural Gazette, 6 July 1861, pp. 631–2).
Thomas Booth and his sons John and Richard Booth of Killerby and later Warlaby, Yorkshire were the originators of the ‘Booth’ strain of shorthorn cattle, first bred in 1790 (DNB, EB).
One of CD’s objectives in Orchids had been to demonstrate that cross-fertilisation was the ‘main object’ of the contrivances by which orchids were pollinated (p. 1). He concluded the book by stating: Nature thus tells us, in the most emphatic manner, that she abhors perpetual self-fertilisation.... For may we not infer as probable, in accordance with the belief of the vast majority of the breeders of our domestic productions, that marriage between near relations is likewise in some way injurious,—that some unknown great good is derived from the union of individuals which have been kept distinct for many generations?
CD’s earlier correspondence with Wooler about polyanthuses has not been found; however, see ‘Dimorphic condition in Primula, p. 79 (Collected papers 2: 47). CD cited Wooler’s observations in Variation 1: 365: In the hose and hose primulæ, the calyx becomes brightly coloured and enlarged so as to resemble a corolla; and Mr. W. Wooler informs me that this peculiarity is transmitted; for he crossed a common polyanthus with one having a coloured calyx, and some of the seedlings inherited the coloured calyx during at least six generations.
Having carried out a number of crosses between polyanthuses and common cowslips (Primula veris), CD had concluded that the former were a cultivated variety of the latter (see Correspondence vol. 9, letter to Daniel Oliver, 23 March [1861], this volume, letter to Alphonse de Candolle, 17 June [1862], n. 2, and ‘Three forms of Lythrum salicaria, p. 187 (Collected papers 2: 121).
CD was seeking information on colour variation and ‘striping’ in horses for inclusion in Variation. See also Correspondence vol. 9, letter to the Field, [before 27 April 1861], and letter to W. E. Darwin, 9 May [1861]. The subject is discussed in Variation 1: 55–63.
The journal, the full name of which was The Field, the Farm, the Garden. The Country Gentleman’s Newspaper, does not appear to have published Wooler’s observations on striping in ponies.
Lupton and Walsh 1861, p. 31.
Walsh 1859, pp. 177–86.
Wooler had published a notice on polyanthus in the Cottage Gardener and Country Gentleman in 1860 (Wooler 1860); the journal was renamed the Journal of Horticulture and Cottage Gardener in 1861, but Wooler appears to have published nothing further on the subject.
Wooler refers to CD’s paper, ‘Dimorphic condition in Primula. Wooler’s name is included on CD’s presentation list for the work (see Correspondence vol. 10, Appendix III).
Wooler lived at Halliwell House, Heighington, County Durham; by May 1863 he had moved to Sadberge Hall, near Darlington (see Correspondence vol. 11, letter from W. A. Wooler, 5 May 1863; see also North Eastern Daily Gazette, 5 May 1891).
Donald Beaton’s name appears on CD’s presentation list for ‘Dimorphic condition in Primula; no letter from Beaton on this subject has been found.

Bibliography

Collected papers: The collected papers of Charles Darwin. Edited by Paul H. Barrett. 2 vols. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. 1977.

Correspondence: The correspondence of Charles Darwin. Edited by Frederick Burkhardt et al. 29 vols to date. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1985–.

‘Dimorphic condition in Primula’: On the two forms, or dimorphic condition, in the species of Primula, and on their remarkable sexual relations. By Charles Darwin. [Read 21 November 1861.] Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society (Botany) 6 (1862): 77–96. [Collected papers 2: 45–63.]

DNB: Dictionary of national biography. Edited by Leslie Stephen and Sidney Lee. 63 vols. and 2 supplements (6 vols.). London: Smith, Elder & Co. 1885–1912. Dictionary of national biography 1912–90. Edited by H. W. C. Davis et al. 9 vols. London: Oxford University Press. 1927–96.

EB: The Encyclopædia Britannica. A dictionary of arts, sciences, literature and general information. 11th edition. 29 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1910–11.

Orchids: On the various contrivances by which British and foreign orchids are fertilised by insects, and on the good effects of intercrossing. By Charles Darwin. London: John Murray. 1862.

‘Three forms of Lythrum salicaria’: On the sexual relations of the three forms of Lythrum salicaria. By Charles Darwin. [Read 16 June 1864.] Journal of the Linnean Society (Botany) 8 (1865): 169–96. [Collected papers 2: 106–31.]

Variation: The variation of animals and plants under domestication. By Charles Darwin. 2 vols. London: John Murray. 1868.

Walsh, John Henry (‘Stonehenge’). 1859. The dog in health and disease. London: Longman, Green, Longman, and Roberts.

Wooler, William A. 1860. The varieties of Polyanthus best for early bedding. Cottage Gardener, Country Gentleman’s Companion, and Poultry Chronicle, 29 May 1860, p. 133.

Summary

Believes, contrary to CD, that when anthers arise from petals the development of the pollen is affected by the amputation of the petal.

Believes interbreeding can be used to combine desirable characters, but that, carried beyond narrow limits, it leads to deterioration of the breed.

Has been experimenting on crossing polyanthus.

Letter details

Letter no.
DCP-LETT-3642
From
William Alexander Wooler
To
Charles Robert Darwin
Sent from
Darlington
Source of text
DAR 181: 157
Physical description
ALS 13pp †

Please cite as

Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 3642,” accessed on 24 April 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-3642.xml

Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 10

letter