Thanks CL for orchids acquired from a collector.
Discusses role of Providence in variation. Does CL honestly think it applies to variations in domestication? If not ordained there, sees no reason for it in nature either.
2. Hesketh Crescent | Torquay
My dear Lyell
Very many thanks for the Orchids, which have proved extremely useful to me in two ways I did not anticipate, but were too monstrous (yet of some use) for my special purpose.
When you come to ``Deification'' ask yourself honestly whether what you are thinking applies to the endless variations of domestic production which man accumulates for his mere fancy or use. No doubt these are all caused by some unknown law, but I cannot believe they were ordained for any purpose; & if not so ordained under domesticity, I can see no reason to believe that they were ordained in a state of nature. Of course it may be said that when you kick a stone, or when a leaf falls from a tree, that it was ordained before the foundations of the world were laid, exactly where that stone or leaf should lie. In this sense the subject has no interest for me.—
Once again many thanks for the orchids; you must let me repay you, what you paid the Collector.—
Ever Yours | C. Darwin
- f1 3230.f1See letter to Charles Lyell, 6 August . CD mentioned Lyell's assistance in sending him specimens of `spurless' Orchis pyramidalis in Orchids, p. 41.
- f2 3230.f2See letter to Charles Lyell, [1 August 1861].