Comments on LH's "Anniversary Address of the President", [Q. J. Geol. Soc. Lond. 17 (1861): xxxi–lxxii]. Notes LH's comments on metamorphism, antiquity of man, and the Bible. Thanks him for his remarks on Origin.
Down Bromley Kent
My dear M
I am very much obliged for your Address, which has interested me much. I have been particularly glad to see your excellent summary on metamorphism, for I was very ignorant of the recent researches.— I thought that I had read up pretty well on antiquity of man; but you bring all the facts so well together in a condensed focus, that the case seems much clearer to me.— How curious about the Bible! I declare I had fancied that the date was somehow in the Bible.— You are coming out in a new light as a Biblical critic!
I must thank you for your remarks on the Origin of Species (though I suppose it is almost as incorrect to do so, as to thank a Judge for a favourable verdict): what you have said has pleased me extremely. I am the more pleased, as I would rather have been well attacked than have been handled in the namby-pamby, old-woman style of the cautious Oxford Professor.—
I most sincerely hope that M
Emma sends her very kind remembrances.
- f1 3094.f1The year is provided by the reference to Horner's presidential address (see n. 2, below).
- f2 3094.f2Horner, outgoing president of the Geological Society of London, delivered the presidential address at the society's anniversary meeting on 15 February 1861 (Horner 1861).
- f3 3094.f3Horner devoted a large part of his address to a discussion of recent studies of the chemical basis of metamorphic phenomena in geology (Horner 1861, pp. xl--lx). He pointed out that the `application of chemistry to the explanation of geological phenomena has hitherto received more attention on the continent than with us.' (Horner 1861, p. xl).
- f4 3094.f4Horner examined in one section of his talk the `Evidence of the early existence of the human race' (Horner 1861, pp. lx--lxxi).
- f5 3094.f5CD refers to Horner's comment that the marginal notation in standard editions of the English Bible, which assigned the year 4004
B.C.as the beginning of the world, could be traced to the seventeenth century biblical chronology of James Ussher, bishop of Armagh. Referring to recent discussions about the apparent conflict between Genesis and geology, Horner stated: `The study of geology has become so general that those who are instructed in its mere elements cannot fail to see the discrepancy between this date and the truths which geology reveals.' On this basis, he advocated removing this erroneous date from future editions of the Bible in order to `best express that entire ignorance of ``The Beginning'' which no human power will ever be able to dispel.' (Horner 1861, p. lxx).
- f6 3094.f6Referring to Origin as a `remarkable work', Horner praised CD's `truly philosophic modesty and candour' in presenting objections to his theory and recommended `to the careful study of geologists' the two chapters on the geological record (Horner 1861, pp. xxxix--xl).
- f7 3094.f7The reference is probably to John Phillips, professor of geology at Oxford and Horner's predecessor as president of the Geological Society. The previous year, Phillips had briefly mentioned Origin in his presidential address and later criticised CD's views in his Rede lecture in Cambridge (Phillips 1860).
- f8 3094.f8Ann Susan Horner was suffering from what was regarded as neuralgia. See K. M. Lyell ed. 1890, 2: 307.