All sheets [of Origin, 2d ed.] are ready. Has made a few corrections
and inserted Charles Kingsley's sentence in answer to those who may think the book is irreligious.
Insists page numbering be kept uniform with 1st edition.
Intends to start immediately on the "larger work", with a distinct title.
Fears reviews will be unfavourable but is confident his views will ultimately prevail.
Asks about plans for French edition.
Thanks JM for his exertions on behalf of sales of Origin.
Ilkley Wells House | Otley Yorkshire
My dear Sir
I shall be glad to hear what number of copies you propose to print: I hope it will be a
good many, as that will make, with lessened expences of several kinds, our profits
larger, & because I shall not be interruped by a new Edition. My plan is,
subject to your & Sir C. Lyell's approval, is to leave the
present work as it now stands, merely correcting errors; & at once but
slowly, commence with my larger work. This will have hardly a page in common,
& might bear a quite distinct title; & I sh
So far requires no immediate answer; but will you kindly inform me soon, about
French Edition. I would write to Mad. Belloc, to know whether she still wishes to
translate, & I sh
Pray believe me, My dear Sir | Yours very sincerely | C. Darwin
I return to “Down, Bromley Kent” early on the 7
P.S. | I have omitted, what I particularly wished to say, namely to thank you sincerely for the exertions which you must have taken to sell my volume so promptly.
It will have obviously important effect in getting my notions known.—
Please inform me whether the following is worth inserting on separate Page; I am absolutely indifferent whether yes or no
“This Second Edition is merely a reprint of the first with a few verbal corrections & some omissions. The only passages of the least importance added, are (p. ) on fossil birds, —on (p. ) nascent organs in contradistinction with rudimentary organs, —and lastly (p. ) an extract on the theological bearing of the views advocated in this work.—”
- f1 2566.f1See letter from Charles Kingsley, 18 November 1859, and letter to Charles Kingsley, 30 November .
- f2 2566.f2See letters to John Murray, 14 November , 24 November , and 4 December ; and to J. L. A. de Quatrefages de Bréau, 5 December .
- f3 2566.f3Origin 2d ed., p. 304.
- f4 2566.f4Origin 2d ed., p. 452: ‘Organs, however little developed, if of use, should not be called rudimentary; they cannot properly be said to be in an atrophied condition; they may be called nascent, and may hereafter be developed to any extent by natural selection.’ (Peckham ed. 1959, pp. 708–9).
- f5 2566.f5Origin 2d ed., p. 481. See n. 1, above. Although the changes were made to CD's text, this paragraph describing his alterations was not printed in the second edition. The third and subsequent editions included a table of ‘Additions and corrections’.