skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

From J. H. Gilbert   22 February 1881

Harpenden, | St. Albans.

Feby 22 1881

Dear Mr. Darwin—

I am ashamed to see that your unanswered letter is dated Feby 5, and I fear that I can render you but little aid in the matter of your enquiries.1

You ask whether vegetable mould has an acid reaction, and suppose some connection between this, if it exist, and the acidity of the contents or excretions of earth-worms, which you are disposed to attribute to the humus-acids.2

It happens that we have here scarcely any experimental evidence bearing directly on either point. In this laboratory Mr. Warington has frequently concentrated the watery extract of vegetable mould, and has found the product to have an acid reaction; but having quite other objects in view the nature of the acid has not been investigated, and it may or may not belong to the humus series.3

Some investigators of soils have noted whether they have an acid reaction or not—some having & some not having this character. Detmer (Versuchs-Stationen vol XIV. 248 et seq), discusses the humus bodies of the soil; and among other points refers to the ‘sourness’ of certain soils as having been assumed to be connected with their richness in humus.4 He states, however, that this by no means depends on the richness in humus alone, but on other coincident characters; that if the soil be rich in bases it will not have the acid reaction; but that wet humus soils, or such soils deficient in bases have such reaction, especially sandy soils rich in humus.

For further information on the humus-acids I may refer you to the earlier results of Mulder (The Chemistry of Animal & Vegetable Physiology—about 1845);5 to a useful discussion of the then existing knowledge on the subject of the organic matter of the soil in “How Crops Feed” by S. W. Johnson;(1)6 and for later information to the Vols of the “Jahresbericht der Agricultur-Chemie”;7 and to the Landwirthschaftlichen Versuchs-Stationen, especially the paper of Detmer above referred to. You will be aware that it is stated that the fine root fibrils of some plants at any rate have an acid reaction. It seems probable that this acid may in some cases be malic acid, perhaps more frequently Oxalic acid, but it may be others. I think you will find reference to this in Sachs, but I have lent my volume so cannot refer to it.8 Our own observations lead us to conclude, however, that the mycelium of the fungi of Fairy rings is rich in oxalates.9

As to the acid reaction of the contents and castings of earthworms—is it not possibly due to some acid secreted by the animal itself—uric acid for example?—perhaps Michael Foster would give an answer on this point—or Ray Lankester?10

Much regretting that I cannot render you better service, I am, My Dear Sir | Yours sincerely | J. H. Gilbert

(1) Chapter II, Section 5, and Chapter V. Section 3.

I can lend you “How Crops Feed”—or the Versuchs-Stationen with Detmer’s papers if you have not got them.

CD annotations

Top of letter: ‘Bread Reform & Address’11 pencil

Footnotes

Robert Warington was an agricultural chemist investigating soil processes at Rothamsted Experimental Station (ODNB).
Wilhelm Detmer’s work on the humus bodies of soil was published in the Landwirtschaftlichen Versuchs-Stationen (Agricultural Experimental Stations; Detmer 1871).
The English translation of Gerrit Jan von Mulder’s book was published in 1849 under the title The chemistry of animal & vegetable physiology (Mulder 1849).
Samuel William Johnson published his work on how crops feed in 1870 (S. W. Johnson [1870]).
The first six volumes of the Jahresbericht über die Fortschritte der Agrikulturchemie (Yearly Report on Advances in Agricultural Chemistry) were published between 1858 and 1864; from 1864, the title was changed to Jahresbericht über die Fortschritte auf dem Gesammtgebiete der Agrikultur-Chemie (Yearly Report on the Entire Field of Agricultural Chemistry).
Julius Sachs’s Text-book of botany (Sachs 1875, p. 624). Sachs does not, however, mention what organic acids were present.
For Gilbert’s work on fairy rings (fungi that grow in circles), see Correspondence vol. 23, letter from J. H. Gilbert, 31 December 1875.
CD’s notes are for his reply to Gilbert of 25 February 1881.

Bibliography

Detmer, Wilhelm. 1871. Die natürlichen Humuskörper des Bodens und ihre landwirthschaftliche Bedeutung. (Mittheilungen aus dem agriculturchemische Laboratorium der Universität Leipzig, VI.) Die Landwirtschaftlichen Versuchs-Stationen 14: 248–300.

Johnson, Samuel William. [1870.] How crops feed: a treatise on the atmosphere and the soil as related to the nutrition of agricultural plants. New York: Orange Judd and Company.

Mulder, Gerrit Jan van. 1849. The chemistry of vegetable & animal physiology. Translated by P. F. H. Fromberg. With introduction and notes by James F. W. Johnston. Edinburgh and London: William Blackwood & Sons.

Sachs, Julius. 1875a. Text-book of botany: morphological and physiological. Translated and annotated by Alfred W. Bennett, assisted by W. T. Thiselton-Dyer. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Summary

The laboratory has scarcely any experimental evidence on acidity of humus soil and earthworm excreta. Refers CD to some sources of information.

Letter details

Letter no.
DCP-LETT-13063
From
Joseph Henry Gilbert
To
Charles Robert Darwin
Sent from
Harpenden
Source of text
DAR 165: 43
Physical description
ALS 4pp †, CD note

Please cite as

Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 13063,” accessed on 19 April 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-13063.xml

letter