Has not completed description of NTW's Loricula. Wants permission to have it figured by James de Carle Sowerby. Does NTW have other fossil cirripedes?
Down Farnborough Kent
I fear that you will think me a sad trespasser on your kindness & forbearance,
when I tell you that I have not actually completed my description of Loricula; but I shall do it directly & write now to obtain your
permission to take (myself) your specimen to
Immediately that M
Is there any safe place where I could leave it in London for you, or shall I return it by a messenger?—
I believe I did once before ask you, whether you have any other fossil Cirripedia.—
To save you the trouble of answering, I will assume, without I hear to the contrary
With my best thanks | I remain dear Sir | Your's faithfully | C. Darwin
I assure you that it has not been idleness which has delayed me, but numbers of specimens of other fossil
- f1 1267.f1August 1850 was the only month with a ‘Thursday 8
th’ in the period between the Palaeontographical Society's decision to publish Fossil Cirripedia and the publication of the first volume of this work in 1851, in which Loricula is described.
- f2 1267.f2Loricula pulchella, described in Fossil Cirripedia (1851): 81–6.
- f3 1267.f3James de Carle Sowerby drew all the figures of the specimens in the first volume of Fossil Cirripedia. At the time of writing, CD does not seem to have known that George Brettingham Sowerby Jr had described and figured this specimen in 1843. However, since that time Wetherell had cleared away more material from the specimen, revealing features not seen by G. B. Sowerby Jr, and a new drawing was made for CD's description (Fossil Cirripedia (1851): 81).
- f4 1267.f4John Wickham Flower.