skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

From Henry Reeks   7 April 1879

Thruxton, nr. Andover—

April 7.79

My dear Sir,

Thanks for your kind note, but I take it that the burnet may have other enemies besides slugs, &c,—e.g., man, for it costs a lot of money annually among high class farmers to eradicate the burnet by “spudding” out the plants, from among the sanfoin; therefore, I should fancy that those plants, which so closely resembled the sanfoin, as to escape the eyes of the men employed to “spud” them out, would stand a far greater chance of reproducing its form, and so on ad libitum.1 So also with the seed. A farmer’s first question on buying sanfoin seed is—or should be, “has it burnet amongst it”? If, by chance there should be some seed (as there often is) that so closely resemble the sanfoin seed, as to escape detection in a large sample, surely it would be to the advantage of the plant.

Then again when the burnet was in bloom, those which bore heads of flowers most resembling in shape and color the blooms of sanfoin, would certainly stand a better chance of escaping being pulled up, and thus the mimetic form would surely reproduce itself—

With renewed thanks, | Believe me, dear Sir, | Yours very truly, | Henry Reeks—

C. Darwin, Esqre., M.A., F.R.S. | &c— &c—

Footnotes

CD’s note has not been found. Reeks had suggested that the similarity between sainfoin and burnet was a case of plant mimicry (see letter from Henry Reeks, 3 April 1878).

Summary

Suggests that mimicry of sainfoin by burnet plants is an adaptation against farmers’ weeding.

Letter details

Letter no.
DCP-LETT-11979
From
Henry Stephen (Henry) Reeks
To
Charles Robert Darwin
Sent from
Thruxton
Source of text
DAR 176: 84
Physical description
ALS 4pp

Please cite as

Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 11979,” accessed on 19 April 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-11979.xml

letter