skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

To R. A. Blair   9 December 1878

Down, | Beckenham, Kent.

Dece. 9th. 1878

Dear Sir

Professor Flower has suffered from a long illness & this has caused much delay in the examination of the wings of the geese.1 But I received yesterday his Report & letter which I enclose (& which need not be returned) as you may like to see them.2 I fear that there is no connection between the deformity & the injury. The owner when he saw several goslings thus deformed, (a not uncommon form of quasi inheritance) remembered the accident, & naturally attributed the deformity to this cause. It has been probably a case of “post hoc” & not “propter hoc”.—3 I grieve that you shd. have expended so much time, trouble & great kindness in vain.

As for myself I am well accustomed in my experimental work to get definite results only once in three or four times, & thus alone can Science prosper.—

With my renewed thanks | I remain Dear Sir | Yours faithfully | Ch. Darwin

Footnotes

Blair had sent Flower the deformed wings in July (see letter from R. A. Blair, 17 July 1878).
Post hoc ergo propter hoc: after this therefore because of this (Latin); in logic, the post hoc fallacy is the assumption that since one event followed another, the earlier one must have caused the later one.

Summary

Says deformity of wings of geese is not related to injury to gander. Forwards a report on the birds [11717].

Letter details

Letter no.
DCP-LETT-11780
From
Charles Robert Darwin
To
Reuben Almond Blair
Sent from
Down
Source of text
American Philosophical Society (Mss.B.D25.554)
Physical description
ALS 3pp

Please cite as

Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 11780,” accessed on 26 April 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-11780.xml

letter