To H. E. Strickland 10 February [1849]
Summary
HES’s letter will fructify to some extent: CD will try to be more faithful to rigid virtue and priority. Would not adopt his own notion in cirripede book without prior approval by others. Will not append "Darwin" to any of his species. Feels sure many others share his aversion.
Asks HES’s opinion on retention of generic name Conchoderma.
Author: | Charles Robert Darwin |
Addressee: | Hugh Edwin Strickland |
Date: | 10 Feb [1849] |
Classmark: | Museum of Zoology Archives, University of Cambridge (Strickland Papers) |
Letter no: | DCP-LETT-1225 |
Matches: 4 hits
- … to letter to H. E. Strickland, [4 February 1849] , case A; and letter from H. E. …
- … universally adopted. See letter from H. E. Strickland, 15 February 1849 . Agassiz 1842– …
- … of C. auritum . See letter to H. E. Strickland, 29 January [1849] , n. 5. Lorenz Oken’s …
- … 1813–25 , 3(i): 362. See letter from H. E. Strickland, 15 February 1849 and n. 4. Lepas …
To H. E. Strickland [4 February 1849]
Summary
HES’s arguments are of great weight, but CD cannot yet bring himself to reject well-known names for obscure ones. Sends four cases that he thinks will stagger HES. Cites his problems in classifying cirripedes. CD cannot bear to give new names, yet may do wrong to attach old ones. Not one species is correctly defined. The harm done by "species mongers".
Author: | Charles Robert Darwin |
Addressee: | Hugh Edwin Strickland |
Date: | [4 Feb 1849] |
Classmark: | Museum of Zoology Archives, University of Cambridge (Strickland Papers) |
Letter no: | DCP-LETT-1221 |
Matches: 2 hits
- … that edition. See letter to H. E. Strickland, [19 February 1849] , n. 1. See letter to …
- … See letter from H. E. Strickland, 31 January 1849 . William Thompson , who was preparing …
To H. E. Strickland [19 February 1849]
Summary
Thanks HES for solving his problem. Has some difficulty with HES’s type-species. In arranging genera in a natural order it is often impossible to say which species should be considered the type.
Author: | Charles Robert Darwin |
Addressee: | Hugh Edwin Strickland |
Date: | [19 Feb 1849] |
Classmark: | Museum of Zoology Archives, University of Cambridge (Strickland Papers) |
Letter no: | DCP-LETT-1227 |
To J. D. Hooker 6 October [1848]
Summary
CD makes progress with barnacles. Describes "supplemental" males in detail. In working out metamorphosis, their crustacean homologies followed automatically.
CD opposes appending first describer’s name to specific name.
Author: | Charles Robert Darwin |
Addressee: | Joseph Dalton Hooker |
Date: | 6 Oct [1848] |
Classmark: | DAR 114: 112a |
Letter no: | DCP-LETT-1202 |
Matches: 1 hit
- … nomenclature, see his letter to H. E. Strickland, 29 January [1849] , and the following …
To J. D. Hooker 28 July [1868]
Summary
Sorry to hear of baby’s illness.
Comments on statement that belief in natural selection is passing away. Common descent of species is almost universally accepted now, and this is more important. In large part acceptance is due to Origin. Discusses reception of and interest in Origin in various countries.
Author: | Charles Robert Darwin |
Addressee: | Joseph Dalton Hooker |
Date: | 28 July [1868] |
Classmark: | DAR 94: 80–2 |
Letter no: | DCP-LETT-6292 |
Matches: 1 hit
- … Correspondence vol. 4, letter from H. E. Strickland, 15 February 1849 and n. 5. On …
To Arthur Henfrey 31 March [1855]
Summary
Thanks AH for seeking reference. If AH cannot find Godron [see 1648] it is hopeless. Thanks for reference to C. F. Hornschuch.
Author: | Charles Robert Darwin |
Addressee: | Arthur Henfrey |
Date: | 31 Mar [1855] |
Classmark: | American Philosophical Society (Mss.B.D25.) |
Letter no: | DCP-LETT-1658 |
Matches: 1 hit
- … see Correspondence vol. 4, letter to H. E. Strickland, 29 January [1849] ). Hornschuch …
To Hugh Edwin Strickland 29 January [1849]
Summary
Has altered and added to HES’s list [compiled for Bibliographia zoologiæ et geologiæ, edited by Louis Agassiz and enlarged by HES, (1848–54)].
On zoological nomenclature CD cites a case in which he believes more harm than good would be done by following the rule of priority. Thinks the rule of the first describer’s name being attached in perpetuity to a species has been the greatest curse to natural history. Every genus of cirripedes has a half-dozen names and not one careful description.
Sends a paper he once wrote [missing] on the subject [of zoological nomenclature].
Author: | Charles Robert Darwin |
Addressee: | Hugh Edwin Strickland |
Date: | 29 Jan [1849] |
Classmark: | Museum of Zoology Archives, University of Cambridge (Strickland Papers) |
Letter no: | DCP-LETT-1215 |
Matches: 1 hit
- … in Olfers 1818 . See letter from H. E. Strickland, 31 January 1849 , for his reply. CD …
To J. D. Hooker 12 October 1849
Summary
CD thinks great dam across Yangma valley is a lateral glacial moraine.
Reports on Birmingham BAAS meeting.
Details of water-cure.
Barnacles becoming tedious; careful description shows slight differences constitute varieties, not species.
Lamination of gneiss.
Author: | Charles Robert Darwin |
Addressee: | Joseph Dalton Hooker |
Date: | 12 Oct 1849 |
Classmark: | DAR 114: 116 |
Letter no: | DCP-LETT-1260 |
To Asa Gray 29 November [1857]
Summary
Thanks AG for his criticisms of CD’s views; finds it difficult to avoid using the term "natural selection" as an agent.
Discusses crossing in Fumaria and barnacles.
Has received a naturally crossed kidney bean in which the seed-coat has been affected by the pollen of the fertilising plant.
Finds the rule of large genera having most varieties holds good and regards it as most important for his "principle of divergence".
Author: | Charles Robert Darwin |
Addressee: | Asa Gray |
Date: | 29 Nov [1857] |
Classmark: | Archives of the Gray Herbarium, Harvard University (18) |
Letter no: | DCP-LETT-2176 |
letter | (9) |
Strickland, H. E. | (4) |
Hooker, J. D. | (3) |
Gray, Asa | (1) |
Henfrey, Arthur | (1) |
Darwin, C. R. | (9) |
Strickland, H. E. | (4) |
Hooker, J. D. | (3) |
Gray, Asa | (1) |
Henfrey, Arthur | (1) |