From Thomas Henry Farrer 17 May 1868
3 Gloucester Terrace | Regent’s Park.
17 May/68
My dear Mr Darwin
Will you think me very presumptuous or very troublesome if, having spent a Sunday morning with your fascinating book over a handful of Fly Orchises I venture to raise a question about a statement in it which I cannot verify. You say that the pollinia of this Orchis when removed do not bend down as they do in Orchis mascula &c but that the original bend in the caudicle answers the same purpose.1 They certainly do not bend so quickly or so obviously, but with a good many I have tried I think they certainly do bend.
Taking them out with a needle and putting it down at once so that it may not be turned I find that the distance of the caudicle at the point (a) from the needle, which at first is considerable, always diminishes after a few minutes until the exterior angle of the caudicle at (a) rests upon the needle.2 I think too, but am not sure, that whilst the angle which the base of the caudicle makes with the needle diminishes the pollen mass turns upwards so as to keep it perpendicular to the needle. The result is that when the needle is again inserted into a flower, the side of the pollen mass nearest to the point of the needle will just catch the stigma, which it would not have done in its original position.
I may be & probably am all wrong—but I know you do not despise weak vessels. Pray do not trouble yourself to answer.
By the way, as I am writing, I will mention what my brother told me the other day after reading your book, though I daresay you know it already.3 He used in young & evil days to see a good deal of dog fanciers—and he says that it was a fixed idea with them that there was a constant tendency in most of the fancy breeds of dogs to revert to a lightish brown or liver colour—e.g. that in the case of black & tan terriers, which are always bred for the black & tan colour, there would generally be one wholly brown pup in every litter. He speaks of their impressions and only to a small extent of his own experience.
Believe me | Very truly yours | T H Farrer
Charles Darwin Esq FRS
[Enclosure]

Footnotes
Bibliography
Collected papers: The collected papers of Charles Darwin. Edited by Paul H. Barrett. 2 vols. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. 1977.
‘Fertilization of orchids’: Notes on the fertilization of orchids. By Charles Darwin. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 4th ser. 4 (1869): 141–59. [Collected papers 2: 138–56.]
Orchids 2d ed.: The various contrivances by which orchids are fertilised by insects. By Charles Darwin. 2d edition, revised. London: John Murray. 1877.
Orchids: On the various contrivances by which British and foreign orchids are fertilised by insects, and on the good effects of intercrossing. By Charles Darwin. London: John Murray. 1862.
Variation: The variation of animals and plants under domestication. By Charles Darwin. 2 vols. London: John Murray. 1868.
Summary
Raises a question about a statement in Orchids; his observations differ.
Letter details
- Letter no.
- DCP-LETT-6178
- From
- Thomas Henry Farrer, 1st baronet and 1st Baron Farrer
- To
- Charles Robert Darwin
- Sent from
- London, Gloucester Terrace, 3
- Source of text
- DAR 163: 14/2; DAR 164: 40
- Physical description
- ALS 7pp encl sketch
Please cite as
Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 6178,” accessed on 26 September 2022, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-6178.xml
Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 16