skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

To A. G. More   17 June [1861]1

Down. | Bromley. | Kent. S.E.

June 17th.

Dear Sir

I suppose you are at home again, & I sincerely hope that you are nearly well again.— I write chiefly to say that since writing to you I have been lucky enough to receive H. viridis.2 You propose to look at Bee again & very glad I shall be to hear result.— But I am convinced this flower will remain an everlasting puzzle to me.—3 I shall, also, be eminently grateful for observations on E. palustris.—4

You mention Spiranthes: it is no use watching this, for I watched it last autumn at Eastbourne till I was sick:5 it is, I have no doubt visited by moths.— Have you any entomologist near you? if you could persuade him to collect moths at night when near where the Spiranthes grows, he might find pollinia attached to proboscis & this would be a real treasure to me.— By the way, I have just thought that I shd be very glad if you would repeat one little experiment on Spiranthes & let me quote you as witness, if you succeed.

First open flower just to see position of parts—

diagram

Take thin, straight flexible bristle or culm of grass—push it into nectary, to do which, on account of oblique projecting stigma, it must be pushed down near labellum.— Do this often & nothing will happen.— Then before withdrawing the culm of grass, bow it by pushing down, so that convex surface touches the exact (but hidden) median line of rostellum & you will generally find that the pollinia (by most curious contrivance) stick to the culm. I was led to try this by reflecting that in act of withdrawal moths bow their probosces.—

Lastly insert culm with the pollen-masses adherent, into the nectary of the same or another flower & you will find pollen-grains adherent on projecting stigma.— The point on which I want a wit-ness is the necessity of the bristle or culm being bowed so as to strike middle line of rostellum before it is withdrawn, in order that pollinia may be removed.— You must be careful not to try flowers from which pollen-masses have been withdrawn by insects: it is best to choose the upper flowers which have been open only one or two days.— Will you keep this note & try this little experiment?—6 I shall publish on British Orchids this late autumn.—7

My dear Sir | Yours sincerely | C. Darwin

Footnotes

This letter was first published in Correspondence vol. 9, transcribed from a copy on which the year is recorded (DAR 146: 396).
CD had asked More whether he had access to Habenaria (or Peristylus) viridis (see letter to A. G. More, 2 June [1861]); shortly afterwards, CD received specimens from Bingham Sibthorpe Malden (see letter to B. S. Malden, 15–16 June [1861]). Peristylus viridis and Habenaria viridis are synonyms of Dactylorhiza viridis, the frog orchis.
CD refers to the bee-orchis, Ophrys apifera. The ‘puzzle’ was that this species alone of all orchids appeared to be adapted to favour perpetual self-fertilisation. See Orchids, pp. 63–71. More’s observations of bee-orchids growing on the Isle of Wight supported CD’s own findings (ibid., pp. 67–8).
A description of Epipactis palustris, including More’s observations on the adaptations of the flower for insect visits, is given in Orchids, pp. 95–102. See letters to A. G. More, 19 July [1861] and 13 August [1861].
The Darwins spent nine weeks in Eastbourne in the autumn of 1860 (see Correspondence vol. 8, Appendix II).
An account of this experiment is provided in Orchids, pp. 125–6, but More is not mentioned.
At this point, CD was planning to write an article on orchids for publication by the Linnean Society of London. After his manuscript became too long to be printed in a journal, he decided to publish it in book form. Orchids was published in May 1862 (Freeman 1977, p. 112).

Bibliography

Correspondence: The correspondence of Charles Darwin. Edited by Frederick Burkhardt et al. 29 vols to date. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1985–.

Freeman, Richard Broke. 1977. The works of Charles Darwin: an annotated bibliographical handlist. 2d edition. Folkestone, Kent: William Dawson & Sons. Hamden, Conn.: Archon Books, Shoe String Press.

Orchids: On the various contrivances by which British and foreign orchids are fertilised by insects, and on the good effects of intercrossing. By Charles Darwin. London: John Murray. 1862.

Summary

Would be grateful for observations on orchids.

Believes Spiranthes visited by moths. Asks AGM to repeat experiment on Spiranthes.

Letter details

Letter no.
DCP-LETT-3187
From
Charles Robert Darwin
To
Alexander Goodman More
Sent from
Down
Source of text
Royal Irish Academy (A. G. More papers RIA MS 4 B 46)
Physical description
ALS 6pp

Please cite as

Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 3187,” accessed on 28 March 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-3187.xml

Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 9

letter