skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

To Annie Dowie   1 August [1875]1

Down, | Beckenham, Kent. | Railway Station | Orpington. S.E.R.

Aug. 1st

My dear Mrs Dowie

I thank you most warmly for all the trouble you have so kindly taken, & for your two very pleasant letters.2 You flatter me (though this is not the proper word) so delightfully about my old friends, the tendrils, that I must send you my book just published about new friends, “Insectivorous Plants”; though there are only bits here & there which readable.—3

I shd like very much to go to Bristol & have long wished to attend one more Brit. Assocn., but I cannot stand so much excitement & talk.4

Now for business,—nothing can be clearer or fuller than your account; but I am much perplexed what to conclude, as Paget thinks the interest or importance of the case largely depends on the certainty of the removal of the base of the bone. He has known an amputated stump of the humerus to grow a little, but thinks this very different from a quite new bone being reformed.—.5 I hope that you will not think I have acted badly, when I say that to give him confidence I told him it was your Father who gave me the information & that Prof. Syme6 was the operator. I told him not to mention your Father’s name to anyone & he says he has not done so; but has applied to Mr Annandale7 (Syme’s assistant) who applied to his Sister8 to know whether Syme had ever mentioned any such case; but he never had to either.

Under these circumstances, & as Pagets excellent judgment wd be of greatest value to me, I hope I may lay an abstract of your Fathers diary & of the facts which you mention, before him,—again cautioning him not to mention names to anyone.9 I feel bound in honour either to strike out whole case & confess to an error, or to substantiate my statement by details & by the judgment of an experienced physiologist & surgeon, like Paget.10

Now there is one other thing, could you persuade your sister to make a tracing of her hand, the palm being placed quite flat on the paper with the pencil held vertically all the time.11 This would show form of the protuberance & its size. You would of course say that this tracing will be considered as strictly confidential.

Believe me that I feel deeply grateful to you, for to be indirectly accused of perverting the truth is the most painful acusation which can be made against me.

I remain dear Mrs Dowie | Yours truly obliged | Charles Darwin

P.S If your sister consents to oblige, perhaps it wd be best to give two tracings, one with palm flat on paper, & the other with the back of the hand flat on paper.12

Footnotes

The year is established by the relationship between this letter and the letter to Annie Dowie, 27 July 1875.
CD had asked Dowie for information on a case reported to him by her father, Robert Chambers, of the apparent regrowth of an amputated extra finger (letter to Annie Dowie, 27 July 1875). CD described the case at length in Variation 2: 14–15. Only one reply to this letter from Dowie has been found, the letter from Annie Dowie, [after 27 July 1875].
Insectivorous plants was published on 2 July 1875 (CD’s ‘Journal’ (Appendix II)). Presumably, either the missing portion of the letter from Annie Dowie, [after 27 July 1875], or the missing letter contained a reference to Climbing plants.
The forty-fifth meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science took place in Bristol in August 1875; Dowie’s husband, James Muir Dowie, had been a member since 1870 (‘List of members of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. 1876’. Appendix to Report of the 45th meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (1875)).
See n. 2 above. For James Paget’s scepticism about apparent cases of regrowth, see the letter to Annie Dowie, 27 July 1875 and n. 3.
The reference may be to a nursing sister. Alternatively, Annandale may have approached Syme’s sister-in-law, Frances Willis; Syme had no sisters (Paterson 1874, p. 1).
In Variation 2d ed. 1: 459, CD referred to Paget’s conclusion that the degree of growth in amputated extra digits was no greater than might occur in normal bones, and withdrew his former conclusion that their appearance in humans could be explained by reversion to a progenitor with more than five digits (Variation 1: 14–15).
See Variation 2d ed. 1: 459; a tracing of the hand was shown to Paget.

Bibliography

Climbing plants: On the movements and habits of climbing plants. By Charles Darwin. London: Longman, Green, Longman, Roberts & Green; Williams & Norgate. 1865.

Insectivorous plants. By Charles Darwin. London: John Murray. 1875.

Paterson, Robert. 1874. Memorials of the life of James Syme. Edinburgh: Edmonston and Douglas.

Variation 2d ed.: The variation of animals and plants under domestication. By Charles Darwin. 2d edition. 2 vols. London: John Murray. 1875.

Variation: The variation of animals and plants under domestication. By Charles Darwin. 2 vols. London: John Murray. 1868.

Summary

Thanks AD for her account [of the regrowth of her sister’s amputated supernumerary finger]. Is much perplexed what to conclude. Feels he should either retract his account [in Variation, 1st ed., 2: 14–15] or substantiate it by judgment of a physiologist like James Paget. Asks for tracings of her sister’s hand. [See Variation, 2d ed., 1: 459].

Letter details

Letter no.
DCP-LETT-10106
From
Charles Robert Darwin
To
Anne (Annie) Chambers/Anne (Annie) Dowie
Sent from
Down
Source of text
National Library of Australia (MS 760/2/10–11)
Physical description
ALS 7pp

Please cite as

Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 10106,” accessed on 23 April 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-10106.xml

Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 23

letter