skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

From Alfred Wrigley   12 March 1868

Grammar School, | Clapham, S.

March 12 | 1868

My dear Sir

The letter sent to you in my last, was the most recent of those I had the pleasure of receiving from you.1 I was under the impression that the intention of removing Horace was in abeyance—and that it would be abandoned or deferred. In struggling against certain educational defects, I refer especially to writing, spelling⁠⟨⁠,⁠⟩⁠ style &c, &c, I may occasionally have hurt his feelings. In other respects, he has ever shewn himself gentle and docile—with good intelligence but lacking activity. This I attribute to his taking but little exercise.

The intimations made at Christmas respecting Horace, although I hoped that subsequent events might prevent their being carried out, were quite sufficient ‘notice’;2 and this view entirely precluded from my mind any other.

I shall part from Horace with much regret, and with my best wishes for his future success in life.

The enquiries of Mr Rouse I will answer this evening.3

I remain | My dear Sir | Yours very sincerely | Alfred Wrigley

Charles Darwin Esqre.

Footnotes

In his letter of 11 March [1868], CD had worried that he had not given sufficient notice of Horace Darwin’s removal from Clapham Grammar School.
Rolla Charles Meadows Rouse had written to Wrigley for a character reference for Horace (see letter from Alfred Wrigley, 9 March 1868).

Summary

Had hoped that the intention of removing Horace from school had been abandoned and regrets that it has not.

Letter details

Letter no.
DCP-LETT-6006
From
Alfred Wrigley
To
Charles Robert Darwin
Sent from
Clapham Grammar School
Source of text
DAR 181: 182
Physical description
ALS 3pp

Please cite as

Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 6006,” accessed on 18 April 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-6006.xml

Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 16

letter