skip to content
Home

Darwin Correspondence Project

From Charles Kingsley   12 July 1866

Eversley Rectory, Winchfield.

July 12/66

My dear Mr. Darwin

I flee to you, as usual in ignorance & wonder.1

Have you investigated the migration of the eye in Flatfish? I have been reading a paper on it by Prof. Thompson in Nat. Hist. Mag. for May 1865.—2

I look to your methods for explaining how the miracle takes place; whether the eye passes through the scull, or round the soft parts, is a minor question.3

Will you kindly do me the honour to look at 2 lectures of mine on Science & Superstition gn at the Royal Institution, & reprinted in Frazer’s Mag. for June & July?4

I think you will find that I am not unmindful of your teaching.

I heard with extreme pleasure that your health is much improved.

Yours ever with deep respect & attachment | C Kingsley

Footnotes

1
CD and Kingsley began to correspond soon after the publication of Origin (see Correspondence vol. 7, letter from Charles Kingsley, 18 November 1859).
2
Kingsley refers to the article by Charles Wyville Thomson, ‘Notes on Prof. Steenstrup’s views on the obliquity of flounders’, in the Annals and Magazine of Natural History for May 1865 (C. W. Thomson 1865). Thomson gave an abstract, with commentary, of a paper by Japetus Steenstrup on the migration of the eye of flounders.
3
CD discussed the migration of the eye in Pleuronectidae, or flatfish (now righteye flounders), in Origin 6th ed., pp. 186–8, citing Malm 1867. He argued that, when young and still with their eyes on opposite sides, the fish cannot long retain their vertical position, owing to the excessive depth of their bodies, the small size of their lateral fins, and the absence of a swimbladder; growing tired, they fall to the bottom on one side, and while at rest twist their lower eye upwards. Eventually the fish remain permanently on their side, and the eye on the under side gradually shifts around to the upper side. CD concluded that the repositioning of the eye was a result of the inherited effects of use, possibly strengthened by natural selection. See Vorzimmer 1969–70.
4
The references are to Kingsley 1866a and 1866b.

Bibliography

Correspondence: The correspondence of Charles Darwin. Edited by Frederick Burkhardt et al. 29 vols to date. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1985–.

Malm, August Wilhelm. 1867. Bidrag till kännedom af Pleuronektoidernas utveckling och byggnad. Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar 7 (1867–8): (4th paper) 1–28.

Origin 6th ed.: The origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. 6th edition, with additions and corrections. By Charles Darwin. London: John Murray. 1872.

Origin: On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. By Charles Darwin. London: John Murray. 1859.

Thomson, Charles Wyville. 1865. Notes on Prof. Steenstrup’s views on the obliquity of flounders. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 3d ser. 15: 361–71.

Vorzimmer, Peter J. 1969–70. Darwin’s ‘Lamarckism’ and the "flat-fish controversy" (1863–71). Lychnos 12: 121–70.

Summary

Asks for CD’s opinion of the manner of migration of the eye of flatfish.

Letter details

Letter no.
DCP-LETT-5154
From
Charles Kingsley
To
Charles Robert Darwin
Sent from
Eversley
Source of text
DAR 169: 34
Physical description
ALS 4pp

Please cite as

Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 5154,” accessed on 19 April 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-5154.xml

Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 14

letter

Darwin Correspondence Project
darwin@lib.cam.ac.uk

© University of Cambridge 2022

Copyright declaration

Privacy policy

Website by Surface Impression

 

Study at Cambridge

About the University

Research at Cambridge