skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

To T. L. Brunton   14 February 1882

Down | Beckenham— Kent—

Feb 14. 1882

Dear Dr. Lauder Brunton

I am very much obliged for your information in regard to the association, about which I feel a great interest.1 It seems to me highly desirable that the association should include as many medical and scientific men as possible throughout the whole country, who could illumine those capable of illumination on the necessity of physiological research; but that the Assocn. should be governed by a Council of powerful men not too many in number— Such a council as representing a large body of medical men would have more power in the eyes of vote=hunting politicians than a small body representing only themselves—

From what I see of country practitioners, I thinks that their annual subscription ought to be very small— But would it not be possible to add to the rules some such statement as the following one:— “That by a donation of £.... or of any larger sum from those who feel a deep interest in the progress of medical science, the donor shall become a life member”. I for one would gladly subscribe £50 or £100— If such a plan were approved by the leading medical men of London two or three thousand pounds might at once be collected; and if any such sum could be announced as already subscribed when the programme of the Assocn. is put forth, it wd have, as I believe, a considerable influence on the country, & would attract the attention of country practitioners. The Anti-corn Law League owed much of its enormous power to several wealthy men laying down £1000;2 for the subscription of a good sum of money is the best proof of earnest conviction— you asked for my opinion on the above points, and I have given it freely, though well aware that from living so retired a life my judgement cannot be worth much. Have you read Mr. Gurney’s article in the Fortnightly and Cornhill?3 They seem to me very clever though obscurely written; & I agree with almost everything that he says, except with some passages which appear to imply that no experiments shd be tried, unless some immediate good can be predicted, & this is a gigantic mistake contradicted by the whole history of science—

Believe me dear Dr. Brunton | Yours very sincerely | Ch. Darwin

P.S. | That is a curious fact about babies; I remember hearing on good authority that very young babies when moved are apt to clutch hold of anything, & I thought of your explanation; but your case during sleep is a much more interesting one.4 Very many thanks for the book which I much wanted to see; it will be sent back to-day, as from you, to the Society.5

Footnotes

See letter from T. L. Brunton, 12 February 1882 and n. 1. Brunton had written about the proposed Science Defence Association.
Formed in 1839, the Anti-Corn Law League was a group that agitated for repeal of the Corn Laws of 1815, and promoted free trade. Although the group had wide support among the general populace, much of its financial backing came from rich Manchester mill owners. For more on the league, see Pickering and Tyrrell 2000.
Edmund Gurney had written an article in the Fortnightly Review, 15 December 1881, on the ethics of animal experiments (Gurney 1881) and another in the Cornhill Magazine, February 1882, responding to essays supporting vivisection that appeared in Nineteenth Century, December 1881 (Gurney 1882a; Paget et al. 1881). See also Correspondence vol. 29, letter to James Paget, 3 December 1881.
In his letter of 12 February 1882, Brunton mentioned that his baby daughter, Elsie, would not go to sleep without something in her hand.
There is no mention of a book in the letter from T. L. Brunton, 12 February 1882.

Bibliography

Correspondence: The correspondence of Charles Darwin. Edited by Frederick Burkhardt et al. 29 vols to date. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1985–.

Gurney, Edmund. 1881. A chapter in the ethics of pain. Fortnightly Review 36: 778–96.

Gurney, Edmund. 1882a. An epilogue on vivisection. Cornhill Magazine 45: 191–9.

Paget, James, et al. 1881. Vivisection: its pains and uses. [Three essays.] Nineteenth Century 10: 920–48.

Pickering, Paul A. and Tyrrell, Alex. 2000. The people’s bread: a history of the Anti-Corn Law League. London and New York: Leicester University Press.

Summary

Agrees with TLB’s views regarding the constitution of the proposed Science Defence Association.

Letter details

Letter no.
DCP-LETT-13687
From
Charles Robert Darwin
To
Thomas Lauder Brunton, 1st baronet
Sent from
Down
Source of text
DAR 160: 353–353/1
Physical description
C 5pp

Please cite as

Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 13687,” accessed on 19 April 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-13687.xml

letter