From G. H. Darwin 29 July 1874
Trin Coll
July. 29. 74
My dear Father,
As I said in my contradictory letter, I have changed my opinion very much in the matter of the Quarterly Review.1 I showed the extract to Jackson2 & he quite agreed as to the scurrility of the attack. Tho’ no lawyer he seemed to think that it cd. hardly be a libel at law. It happens to be circuit time, & I showed it to a barrister friend, who, tho’ he has no practise, has seen a good deal of other people’s. He thought it a very nice point as to whether it is libellous or not. I cd. not allege ‘special damage’ i.e specific injury in trade or profession, but shd. have to go on the fact that it holds me up to reprobation or ridicule. Both he & Jackson seemed to think decidedly that it wd. not be worth going to law about. Jackson thinks (& I agree, unless reconverted by you) that the best course will be for me to write an explicit denial & short account of my essay & to send it for publication (thro’ you) in the next ly.— He also thinks that they wd. most likely publish it, & I think considering the pressure that you cd. exert on Murray, & he on the Editor that it wd. almost certainly be accepted.3 He also thinks that Murray might possibly not object to publish an explicit denial, but might to a sketch of the Essay.
I have therefore begun & almost done my proposed draft & have consulted Jackson, which I will send in a few days. I wd. suggest that we shd. go for the insertion of the whole, & only submit to its curtailment if Murray shd. demand it. This wd. be I think quite sufficient to vindicate me. It wd. be infinitely more likely to be accepted than a counsel’s opinion—which we shd. however be of course at liberty to publish. Shd. we be met by a point-blank refusal it will be time to think of more hostile measures. I have ordered the Quarterly & am going to read the whole article & if it shd. seem worth the powder & shot, I shd. like to have a try to answer it, as his disgusting sentence about you & Mill rankles in me a good deal.4 The Pall Mall noticed it scornfully on Tuesday, but made no reference to the obnoxious parts.5 I shall be very glad to hear what you have to say to all this.
The sentences about me are compiled with a skilful venom certainly!
I am very comfortable up here, & there is a holy calm over the whole place which suits me. There are several friends of mine up now, tho’ Jackson goes off to Switzd. tomorrow I am sorry to say. Frank B.6 is up—or rather he went away yest. & comes back on Friday.
I met Michael Foster in the court just now with one of the Huxley girls. I didn’t feel absolutely certain whether it was Maidy7 or not, & so I suppose it was’nt, but she was most marvellously like her. I hear the H’s are giving up Whitby & going to Littlehampton.8 I hope your Abinger visit was successful & that your collapse has not come on.9
I wrote to Clowes on Mond. about sending me proofs.10 I think I shall probably stay here a fortnight, as there is some mathematics I want to read & I must get the books from the library; but goodness knows whether I shall have the go for it. I have been doing a little yesterday & today. The sickness keeps off thanks entirely to ipecac., but I have extreme discomfort when I shd. otherwise be sick, I think however I am a little on the mend, & I have managed to play tennis for an hour both today & yest. I fear I shall go on losing flesh if that state of bowels continues to wh. I referred yest.11
I had a very civil letter from Reginald Darwin (who is with the channel fleet & his son I supp) sending kind messages to you12
Your affec son | George Darwin
Footnotes
Bibliography
Correspondence: The correspondence of Charles Darwin. Edited by Frederick Burkhardt et al. 29 vols to date. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1985–.
Darwin, George Howard. 1873b. On beneficial restrictions to liberty of marriage. Contemporary Review 22: 412–26.
Darwin, George Howard. 1874b. Note upon the article ’Primitive man–Tylor and Lubbock,‘ in No. 273. (Letter to the editor, 7 August 1874.) Quarterly Review 137: 587–8.
Descent 2d ed.: The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. By Charles Darwin. 2d edition. London: John Murray. 1874.
Huxley, Leonard, ed. 1900. Life and letters of Thomas Henry Huxley. 2 vols. London: Macmillan.
[Mivart, St George Jackson.] 1874b. Primitive man: Tylor and Lubbock. [Essay review of the works of John Lubbock and Edward Burnett Tylor.] Quarterly Review 137 (1874): 40–77.
Origin: On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. By Charles Darwin. London: John Murray. 1859.
Summary
After taking advice he has decided to write an explicit denial and short account of his essay and send it to the Quarterly Review.
Letter details
- Letter no.
- DCP-LETT-9575
- From
- George Howard Darwin
- To
- Charles Robert Darwin
- Sent from
- Trinity College, Cambridge
- Source of text
- DAR 210.2: 37
- Physical description
- ALS 8pp
Please cite as
Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 9575,” accessed on 8 October 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-9575.xml
Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 22