From Albert Günther 1 October 1871
Surbiton
Oct. 1. 71
My dear Sir
I am afraid my answers are this time not satisfactory; but it is all I can give, and do not know where else I could steal for you.1
I was very sorry to hear that you are very unwell; all I can say is “do not work”. You can be satisfied with having set the stone rolling; it will find its proper road whether you try to push it right or left, or whether you leave this part of the business to Messrs Mivart & Wright. Surely the latter cannot be a naturalist! Have you another copy to spare of Wright’s pamphlet, I gave mine to a friend who does not return it.2
I am going to Oxford tomorrow for a few days to see what I can do for their collection of Reptiles.3
If you know Dr. Murie, ask him for a copy of his restoration of Sivatherium. It will amuse you. There is so much poetry & artistic skill in it that I shall have it framed.4
I am hard at work at—alas—many things; but my chief work is continuing the examination of Ceratodus. I have now made out, that it not only has the sexual apparatus of a tailed Batrachian, but also invests its eggs with a glutinous substance as a frog or Salamander.5
With kindest regards | to Mrs Darwin | Yours most truly | A Günther
[Enclosure]
1, I have not seen the paper on the distribution of nerves in the ear of the Mouse. When I find it, I will let you know, although I am afraid it will be too late for your purpose.6
2, There is no Rodent with a structurally prehensile tail, more nearly related to Mus, than Synetheres (Cercolabes). But it may be of interest to you that several species of Mus have a functionally prehensile tail. I have seen only the other day some living specimens of the Harvest-Mouse (Mus minutus) in the possession of Prof. Maskelyne. In climbing up vertical reeds, or in moving from one reed to another they use their tail as much as if it were a truly prehensile organ; they wind it round a vertical or horizontal stem, suspend themselves by means of it, but they do not seize an object, except for the purposes of locomotion or sustaining themselves in a certain position.7
3, I know that Dr. Murie makes an Eland of the Sivatherium; & he will shortly publish a restored figure of it which gives it a broad, long muzzle, like that of the Eland, but not a proboscis.8
Macrauchenia has no proboscis, according to the best authorities9
4, That Galaxias goes down to the sea, is extremely improbable. Of the thousands of fishes received from the Southern Pacific, not one was a Galaxias; whenever Galaxias was sent, it was sent with other freshwater-forms. In the numerous letters I have received from Tasmania, Australia & New Zealand regarding these fishes, they were always described as truly Freshwater-forms; nothing was ever said or written about their having been met with in the sea.10 Yet they are as well known to the colonists as the Trout in Europe. I cannot add anything more than what you find in the Catalogue, with regard to their distribution.11 However, the case of Galaxias is somewhat strengthened by two well-marked forms of Lampreys being found in Australia & S.W. America. I can vouch for the correctness of the localities, as it has been confirmed over & over again.
a. Mordacia mordax distinguished by a most formidable dentition is found at Valparaiso and Tasmania (Catal. Fish. VIII. p. 507)
b. Geotria chilensis from Chile, New Zealand and Swan River (ibid. p. 509).12
Now, you will say the Lampreys enter the sea; nevertheless, it is also true that they do not go far from the mouth of the river which is their true home & place of birth. They are among the very worst swimmers, & to account for their passage across the Pacific, you must assume that they attached themselves to other fish which carried them across. They could not have gradually made their way across, as they do not spawn in the sea, but in rivers; & their spawn could not live in seawater.
CD annotations
Footnotes
Bibliography
Correspondence: The correspondence of Charles Darwin. Edited by Frederick Burkhardt et al. 29 vols to date. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1985–.
Günther, Albert Charles Lewis Gotthilf. 1859–70. Catalogue of acanthopterygian fishes in the collection of the British Museum. 8 vols. London: by order of the Trustees.
McDowall, Robert Montgomery. 1988. Diadromy in fishes: migrations between freshwater and marine environments. London: Croom Helm.
Murie, James. 1871. On the systematic position of the Sivatherium giganteum of Falconer and Cautley. Geological Magazine 8: 438–48, 526–7.
Origin 6th ed.: The origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. 6th edition, with additions and corrections. By Charles Darwin. London: John Murray. 1872.
Rachootin, Stan Philip. 1985. Owen and Darwin reading a fossil: Macrauchenia in a boney light. In The Darwinian heritage, edited by David Kohn. Princeton: Princeton University Press in association with Nova Pacifica (Wellington, NZ).
Wall, William P. 1980. Cranial evidence for a proboscis in Cadurcodon and a review of snout structure in the family Amynodontidae (Perissodactyla, Rhinocerotoidea). Journal of Paleontology 54: 968–77.
Summary
Sorry to hear of CD’s poor health.
Is hard at work examining Ceratodus.
Encloses discussion of Mus species with functionally prehensile tails.
Encloses argument against freshwater fish entering the sea.
Letter details
- Letter no.
- DCP-LETT-7980
- From
- Albrecht Carl Ludwig Gotthilf (Albert) Günther
- To
- Charles Robert Darwin
- Sent from
- Surbiton
- Source of text
- DAR 165: 246; DAR 205.3: 274
- Physical description
- ALS 4pp encl 2pp †
Please cite as
Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 7980,” accessed on 4 October 2023, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-7980.xml
Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 19