skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

From W. E. Darwin   [7–15 April 1868]1

Langstaff says that he never has seen the platysma act & always looks out.2

His belief from his own experience is that it is what may be called rudimentary in Human Beings.

There is often very bad dyspnoea under Chloroform and he has lately seen a bad case of Tetynus3 where the head was thrown far back & the muscles from the shoulders acting violently, the mouth was violently clenched, & from the position of head he should have thought the platysma ought to have acted, as the clenching of the jaws would give it a purchase to act from.4

I will ask him again about this case

Footnotes

The date range is established by the relationship between this letter and the letters from W. E. Darwin, [7 April 1868] and [15 April 1868].
In Expression, p. 301, CD cited Charles Langstaff’s observation that the platysma did not contract in patients with extreme respiratory difficulties. The platysma, or platysma myoides, was described by CD as a rudimentary muscle in humans (Descent 1: 19). See also letter from St G. J. Mivart, 6 April 1868, n. 2.
Tetanus, or lockjaw.
Having received information from various sources, CD concluded that the platysma did contract in patients suffering from lockjaw (Expression, p. 301).

Summary

Langstaff has never seen the platysma act, and he believes it to be rudimentary in humans.

Letter details

Letter no.
DCP-LETT-6076
From
William Erasmus Darwin
To
Charles Robert Darwin
Sent from
unstated
Source of text
DAR 162: 80/4
Physical description
2ppinc

Please cite as

Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 6076,” accessed on 26 April 2019, http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/DCP-LETT-6076

Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 16

letter