To J. D. Hooker 17 March [1863]
Down Bromley Kent
March 17th
My dear Hooker
What a candid honest fellow you are,—too candid & too honest. I do not believe one man in ten thousand would have thought & said what you say about your own work in your letter.1 I told Lyell that nothing pleased me more in his work than the conspicuous position in which he very properly placed you.2 About dates of your Essay & the Origin, I feared I might be thought to have told untruths, so I mentioned to Lyell that I had asked you (which I think you have forgotten) when I was writing my “historical sketch” the date of publication of your Essay & you wrote to me “December”;3 the Origin was published to world & every copy sold on Novr. 24th, but was finished ie last sheet corrected Oct 1. (& Oct 2d. I started for Ilkley), but was kept back by Murray for auction-sale; but private copies were distributed a good while before.4 But all this is absolutely & wholly immaterial, excepting so far that anyone might think that Lyell has found out that I had misrepresented case.—5
I am really sorry for Lyell’s troubles about so many claimants for notice: he has sent me the long P.S. addressed to you about Falconer;6 I never heard such nonsense, as that of the monkey case.7 Do see Falconer & see whether you can at all influence him, by saying what ill appearance Reclamations always have, & that the future historians of Science alone ought to settle such points.— It is wretched to see men fighting so for a little fame.—
I am so glad that you heartily admire parts of Huxley’s book.8 It can be only from brevity with which he treats species-question that he does not notice your great works: I do not remember that he even alludes to the grand subject of Geograph. Distribution.— The greatest blemish in my opinion in Lyell’s work9 (which I have said to no one) strikes me as a certain want of originality in the whole.— I have read Owen on Aye-Aye: it is nothing new: it gave me no scope for attacking him, & I had partly composed such a good letter (!);10 I long to be in the same boat with all (except you) my friends ie at open war; but at same time I rejoice not to be annoyed at public quarrel, & it would annoy me much.
Thanks about Potatoes & Poplars.—11 I was very glad of the Bee-combs; but they did not turn out anything specially interesting; & I am a fool to go on collecting materials for work, when I can clearly see that I shall never publish half my already half-worked out matter.—12
Thank you for telling me about your heart-symptoms, which are very like mine; but thank God I have not yet come to have “worms crawling over my heart”!13 This is first day I have had an hour’s comfort.— If you can come over here on Sunday, we should indeed be delighted; but I shd. doubt it, as it is so far: I would send you back in carriage.—14
I am heartily glad to hear that you mean to think & write about mundane glacial period apropos to your grand Cameroon case.15 How I wish I could have published my M.S in full on this subject, as the sketch in Origin does not do it justice.16 Do not indulge in belief that any one continent could have remained a hot refuge for all tropical productions of world.17 I have of late come to conclusion that there must have been former Tertiary or Secondary cold periods & migrations.18
You speak of Reversions in your letter:19 I have been writing during last fortnight on this subject, i.e., on reversions to particular characters, & have got curious collection of facts & experiments. They have led me to view the whole case rather differently i.e. that the child never inherits from its grandfather or more distant ancestor, but that a crowd of characters lie latent in every living creature & parent.—20
Good Night | my dear old friend | C. Darwin
Footnotes
Bibliography
Correspondence: The correspondence of Charles Darwin. Edited by Frederick Burkhardt et al. 29 vols to date. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1985–.
Hodge, M. J. S. 1985. Darwin as a lifelong generation theorist. In The Darwinian heritage, edited by David Kohn. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press in association with Nova Pacifica (Wellington, NZ).
Hooker, Joseph Dalton. 1859. On the flora of Australia, its origin, affinities, and distribution; being an introductory essay to the flora of Tasmania. London: Lovell Reeve.
Natural selection: Charles Darwin’s Natural selection: being the second part of his big species book written from 1856 to 1858. Edited by R. C. Stauffer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1975.
Origin: On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. By Charles Darwin. London: John Murray. 1859.
Origin US ed.: On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. A new edition, revised and augmented by the author. By Charles Darwin. New York: D. Appleton. 1860.
Prete, Frederick R. 1990. The conundrum of the honey bees: one impediment to the publication of Darwin’s theory. Journal of the History of Biology 23: 271–90.
Variation: The variation of animals and plants under domestication. By Charles Darwin. 2 vols. London: John Murray. 1868.
Summary
Lyell’s Antiquity of man lacks originality.
Statements in Lyell provoke CD to determine exact publication date of Origin and JDH’s introductory essay [to Flora Tasmaniae].
CD now believes in repeated periods of global cooling and migration.
Letter details
- Letter no.
- DCP-LETT-4048
- From
- Charles Robert Darwin
- To
- Joseph Dalton Hooker
- Sent from
- Down
- Source of text
- DAR 115: 187
- Physical description
- ALS 7pp
Please cite as
Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 4048,” accessed on 26 September 2022, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-4048.xml
Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 11