To J. D. Hooker 3 March [1860]
Down Bromley Kent
Saturday March 3d
My dear Hooker
What a days work you had on that Thursday.1 I was not able to go to London till Monday, & then I was a fool for going, for on Tuesday night I had an attack of fever (with a touch of pleurisy) which came on like a Lion, but went off as a lamb, but has shattered me a good bit.—2
I was much interested by your last note. That was a good sneer by the Bishop at Huxley.— 3 I think you expect too much in regard to change of opinion on the subject of species. One large class of men, more especially I suspect of naturalists, never will care about any general question, of which old Gray of Brit. Mus. may be taken as a type;4 & secondly nearly all men, past a moderate age either in actual years or in mind, are, I am fully convinced physically incapable of looking at facts under a new point of view. Seriously I am astonished & rejoiced at progress which subject has made; look at enclosed memorandum.
Owen says my book will be forgotten in 10 years;5 perhaps so, but with such a list, I feel convinced the subject will not. The outsiders, as you say, are strong.—
You say that you think that Bentham is touched, “but like a wise man holds his tongue”.—6 Perhaps you only mean that he cannot decide: otherwise I shd think such silence the reverse of magnanimity; for if others behaved the same way, how would opinion ever progress? It is a direliction of actual duty.—
I am so glad to hear about Thwaites.7 I do not know who “Greene” & “Oliver” are.—8 I have had an astounding letter from Dr. Boott: it might be turned into ridicule against him & me, so will not send it to anyone.— He writes in a noble spirit of love of truth.—9
I wonder what Lindley thinks;—probably too busy to read or think on the question.—10
I am vexed about Bentham’s reticence; for it would have been of real value to know what part appeared weakest to a man of his powers of observation.—
I shd like to have a copy of Huxley’s lecture.—11
I am very very sorry for Huxley about his Lecture: he seems to me vexed. I suppose H. C. Watson was there for he noticed in a letter to me one surprising lapsus linguæ.—12
Farewell | My dear Hooker | Yours affect | C. Darwin
I am very glad to hear that Lady Hooker improves gradually though slowly.—
Is not Harvey in class of men who do not at all care for generalities?13 I remember your saying you could not get him to write on Distribution.— I have found his works very unfruitful in every respect.—
[Enclosure]
Geologists14 Zoologists Physiologists15 Botanists16 Palæontologists17 Lyell Huxley Carpenter Hooker Ramsay J. Lubbock Sir H. Holland H. C. Watson to large extent Jukes L. Jenyns Asa Gray (to large extent) to some extent H. D. Rogers Searles Wood Dr. Boott (to large extent) Thwaites
Footnotes
Bibliography
Correspondence: The correspondence of Charles Darwin. Edited by Frederick Burkhardt et al. 29 vols to date. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1985–.
Harvey, William Henry. 1854. The sea-side book; being an introduction to the natural history of the British coasts. 3d ed. London. [vols. 6,8]
Origin: On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. By Charles Darwin. London: John Murray. 1859.
Summary
CD’s list of fifteen converts. His opinions on opponents and supporters.
Letter details
- Letter no.
- DCP-LETT-2719
- From
- Charles Robert Darwin
- To
- Joseph Dalton Hooker
- Sent from
- Down
- Source of text
- DAR 115: 45
- Physical description
- ALS 6pp list
Please cite as
Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 2719,” accessed on 26 September 2022, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-2719.xml
Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 8