From H. C. Watson 10 March 1857
Thames Ditton
March 10th/57
My dear Sir
I am not quite sure of understanding your question about “variable genera”.1 To explain my uncertainty, I will endeavour to define or state the differences for choice.
1. Genera, of which the species are close, & difficult to distinguish by reason of their similarity;—but the species themselves not remarkably variable. Ex: Carex & Ranunculus (excluding Batrachium)
2. Genera, of which the quasi species are so close that it becomes highly difficult to say whether the genus is composed of a comparatively few extremely variable species, or of many very close species. Ex: Rubus & Hieracium.
3. Genera, the species of which are themselves so variable, & approximating, that it becomes difficult to say where one species ends & the next begins. Ex: Viola & Saxifraga, at least in certain sections or subgenera—
It seems to me that Dr. A. Gray may have inclined to the first, while you perhaps yes certainly intend 2 or 3. I will copy the three categories, that you maybe
CD annotations
Footnotes
Bibliography
Origin: On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. By Charles Darwin. London: John Murray. 1859.
Summary
HCW is trying to define what CD means by "variable" genera.
Letter details
- Letter no.
- DCP-LETT-2063
- From
- Hewett Cottrell Watson
- To
- Charles Robert Darwin
- Sent from
- Thames Ditton
- Source of text
- DAR 181: 35
- Physical description
- inc †
Please cite as
Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 2063,” accessed on 24 September 2023, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-2063.xml
Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 6