skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

To Fritz Müller   20 March 1881

Down, | Beckenham, Kent. | (Railway Station | Orpington. S.E.R.)

March 20th 1881

My dear Sir

I have received the seeds & your most interesting letter of Feb. 7th.1 The seeds shall be sown, & I shall like to see the plants sleeping; but I doubt whether I shall make any more detailed observations on this subject, as now that I feel very old, I require the stimulus of some novelty to make me work. This stimulus you have amply given me in your remarkable view of the meaning of the 2-coloured stamens in many flowers.— I was so much struck with this fact with Lythrum, that I began experimenting on some Melastomaceæ, which have two sets of extremely differently coloured anthers. After reading your letter I turned to my notes, (made 20 years ago!) to see whether they wd. support or contradict your suggestion.2 I cannot tell yet, but I have come across one very remarkable result that seedlings from the crimson anthers were not 120th of the size of seedlings from the yellow anthers of the same flowers.—3 Fewer good seeds were produced by the crimson pollen   I concluded that the shorter stamens were aborting & that the pollen was not good.—

The mature pollen is incoherent & must be flirted against the visiting insect’s body; I remembered this & I found it said in my early notes, that bees wd never visit the flowers for pollen. This made me afterwards write to the late Dr Cruger in the W. Indies, & he observed for me the flowers, & saw Bees pressing the anthers with their mandibles from the base upwards, & this forced a worm-like thread of pollen from the terminal pore, & this pollen the bees collected with their hind legs.4 So that the Melastomas are not opposed to your views.—

I am now working on the habits of worms, & it tires me much to change my subject; so I will lay on one side your letter & my notes, until I have a week’s leisure, & will then see whether my facts bear on your view.5 I will then send a letter to Nature or to Linn. Socy., with the extract from your letter (& this ought to appear in any case) with my own observations, if they appear worth publishing.6 The subject had gone out of my mind, but I now remember thinking that the imperfect action of the crimson stamens might throw light on hybridism. If this pollen is developed according to your view for the sake of attracting insects, it might act imperfectly, as well as if the stamens were becoming rudimentary. I do not know whether I have made myself intelligible.

With ever renewed admiration of your powers of observation & reasoning, I remain | Yours very sincerely | Ch. Darwin

Footnotes

See letter from Fritz Müller, 7 February 1881; the letter is incomplete and in the extant part no reference is made to the seeds that were enclosed. With his letter of 9 January 1881, Müller had enclosed seeds of an unnamed species of Phyllanthus (the genus of leaf flower) and promised to send some of another unnamed species of that genus when they ripened.
See letter from Fritz Müller, 7 February 1881. CD had begun crossing experiments on the Melastomaceae (a synonym of Melastomataceae) in October 1861, believing that plants of this family might exhibit a novel form of dimorphism. Although he continued to work on the family throughout 1862 and 1863 (his notes are in DAR 205.8), he reached no definite conclusion and did not publish on the subject (see Cross and self fertilisation, p. 298 n.).
CD carried out experiments on Heterocentron roseum (a synonym of H. subtriplinervium, pearlflower) between October 1861 and January 1862. He did similar experiments on Monochaetum ensiferum (a synonym of M. calcaratum), Centradenia floribunda, and also on Clarkia elegans (a synonym of C. unguiculata, elegant clarkia), a member of the Onagraceae family. The results of these, showing that flowers fertilised with pollen from the yellow anthers produced twice as much seed as those fertilised with pollen from the crimson anthers, are recorded in a note dated 3 February 1862 (DAR 205.8: 46).
See Correspondence vol. 11, letter to Hermann Crüger, 25 January [1863], and letter from Hermann Crüger, 23 April 1863. Crüger noted that in all cases he observed the bee came only for pollen.
CD began writing Earthworms in the autumn of 1880 (see Correspondence vol. 28 (Appendix II)).
CD made new observations on Monochaetum ensiferum and Centradenia floribunda in April 1881 (DAR 205.8: 21, 43) and on Clarkia elegans between July 1881 and March 1882 (DAR 67: 82–3, 112–13). He did not write to Nature or the Linnean Society on the subject, but Müller’s brother, Hermann Müller, sent a letter that appeared in Nature, 4 August 1881, pp. 307–8, with information from Fritz Müller about the two different types of stamens in another genus of Melastomaceae, Heeria. CD’s annotated copy of the printed letter is in DAR 205.8: 64.

Bibliography

Cross and self fertilisation: The effects of cross and self fertilisation in the vegetable kingdom. By Charles Darwin. London: John Murray. 1876.

Earthworms: The formation of vegetable mould through the action of worms: with observations on their habits. By Charles Darwin. London: John Murray. 1881.

Summary

FM’s view on meaning of two-coloured stamens in many flowers; CD has been looking through his old notes on dimorphism for supporting evidence. Intends to send extract of FM’s letter to Nature or to Linnean Society.

Letter details

Letter no.
DCP-LETT-13091
From
Charles Robert Darwin
To
Johann Friedrich Theodor (Fritz) Müller
Sent from
Down
Source of text
The British Library (Loan MS 10 no 50)
Physical description
ALS 6pp †

Please cite as

Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 13091,” accessed on 23 April 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-13091.xml

letter