From George Bentham 15 February 1880
25, Wilton Place. | S.W.
Feby 15/80
My dearest Darwin
If you do not object would you kindly sign the enclosed and return it to me?1
I have been for the last four or five months at work at Orchideæ for Genera Plantarum and have been wonderfully assisted by your book on the fertilisation of Orchids.2 I had no idea that Lindley and Reichenbach together could have brought the order into such a state of confusion both as to generic limitation and terminology for both showed great ability and intimate knowledge of species.3 I am very glad that you have suppressed the term caudicle which is indiscriminately applied to three very different organs— in Neottieæ &c a true caudicle or tail-like end of the pollen mass—in Epidendreæ a portion of the pollen not consolidated into the pollen masses but connecting them—in Vandeæ what you much more correctly have styled the pedicel, being as you have shown a production of the rostellum I should however prefer the term stipes for pedicel is I believe as generally restricted to the stalk of a single flower as petiole is to the stalk of a leaf whilst stipes is used more generally as the support of any organ.4
I do not like the term gland generally used for what you have called disk but there is some inconvenience in using the latter term on account of its being more generally applied sometimes to an expansion of the torus sometimes to the centre of the upper surface of a petal etc.— the appearance of the part in question of the pollinarium is not always that which we associate with the word gland, and only very rarely like that of a quoit but I cannot at present devise a better term than the usually adopted one of gland, which in botany has not any very definite meaning being applied in different instances to very different organs.5
Your labours have done so much to the elucidation of the very curious modifications of the fertilising apparatus in the Order that I trust you will excuse my troubling you with these observations in the hopes that if any improved terminology occurs to you you would kindly communicate it— I have still I have no doubt six months work before I can get through the Order. Hooker is working up the Palms6
Yours very sincerly | George Bentham
Footnotes
Bibliography
Bentham, George. 1881a. Notes on Orchideæ. [Read 20 January 1881.] Journal of the Linnean Society of London (Botany) 18: 281–360.
Bentham, George and Hooker, Joseph Dalton. 1862–83. Genera plantarum. Ad exemplaria imprimis in herbariis Kewensibus servata definita. 3 vols. in 7. London: A. Black [and others].
Dressler, Robert L. 1981. The orchids: natural history and classification. Cambridge, Mass., and London: Harvard University Press.
Lindley, John. 1830–40. The genera and species of orchidaceous plants. London: Ridgways.
MacGillivray, William. 1840. A manual of botany: comprising vegetable anatomy and physiology, or the structure and functions of plants. London: Scott, Webster, and Geary.
Orchids 2d ed.: The various contrivances by which orchids are fertilised by insects. By Charles Darwin. 2d edition, revised. London: John Murray. 1877.
Orchids: On the various contrivances by which British and foreign orchids are fertilised by insects, and on the good effects of intercrossing. By Charles Darwin. London: John Murray. 1862.
Reichenbach, Heinrich Gustav. 1885. Ueber das System der Orchideen. In Bulletin du Congrès international de botanique et d’horticulture, réuni à St.-Pétérsbourg, le 5–15 mai 1884. St Petersburg: Imperial Academy of Sciences.
Summary
Has been at work on Orchideae for Genera plantarum and has found CD’s Orchids wonderfully useful. Comments on some problems of botanical terminology.
Letter details
- Letter no.
- DCP-LETT-12482
- From
- George Bentham
- To
- Charles Robert Darwin
- Sent from
- London, Wilton Place, 25
- Source of text
- DAR 160: 171
- Physical description
- ALS 4pp
Please cite as
Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 12482,” accessed on 9 June 2023, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-12482.xml