skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

To Hugo de Vries   13 February 1879

Down, | Beckenham, Kent.

Feb 13 1879

My dear Sir

I am going to beg a favour of you. I have just read, with great interest & profit, your Essay in Heft 2. 1872 of Arbeiten … Wurzburg1 I have been observing, for a special purpose, the Cotyledons of a large number of plants, & some young leaves, with the stems of all secured to sticks close beneath. They all grew in pots & were placed close to a North East window, & I was greatly troubled (for I was not attending to Heliotropism) by their all turning to the light, though this was not very bright. From these many cases & from statements in almost every botanical book, I wrote in my notes “that all the cotyledons which I observed turned, like leaves, towards a lateral light”. I was therefore much startled when coming to a passage (p. 261) where you say “Aus diesen Versuchen geht hervor (1) dass in vielen Fallen kein Einfluss des Heliotropismus zu bemerken war,”2 I infer therefore that your leaves did not turn to the light. Can the difference between what you so carefully observed, & what I have repeatedly, but only in a few cases, carefully observed, be accounted for by your having cut away the lamina?3

Perhaps you refer exclusively to the heliotropism of the petiole & mid-rib, yet I have often seen the petiole of cotyledons curve towards the light. My plants all grew on their own roots, whilst yours were cut off & stuck in sand; & this perhaps may have made some difference, as it certainly does with the revolving nutation of climbers.4

You know so very much more than I do on all these subjects, that I should be extremely obliged if you would tell me whether you think that I err in saying that cotyledons & young leaves turn to a lateral light, independently of the heliotropic movement of their stems; the stems having been secured to sticks.—

But I do not see how I could have erred.

Forgive me for troubling you & believe me my dear Sir | yours sincerely | Charles Darwin

PS. How do your observations progress on the contraction of young stems and radicles? I hope that you will publish soon.— I trust that you received the seeds from Prof. Asa Gray.—5

Footnotes

De Vries’s essay ‘Ueber einige Ursachen der Richtung bilateralsymmetrischer Pflanzentheile’ (On some causes of the direction of bilaterally symmetrical plant parts; Vries 1872) was published in Arbeiten des botanischen Instituts in Würzburg.
CD’s note has not been found in the Darwin Archive–CUL. For the German, see Vries 1872, p. 261; an English translation of the German quotation is: ‘From these experiments it follows (1) that in many cases no influence of heliotropism was noticed.’
For De Vries’s explanation of cutting away the lamina, see Vries 1872, pp. 262–3.
De Vries’s description of the purpose and methodology of his experiment is in Vries 1872, p. 259.
CD had asked Gray to send seeds of Echinocystis lobata (wild cucumber) to De Vries; see Correspondence vol. 26, letter to Asa Gray, 15 August 1878.

Bibliography

Vries, Hugo de. 1872. Ueber einige Ursachen der Richtung bilateralsymmetrischer Pflanzentheile. Arbeiten des botanischen Instituts in Würzburg 1 (1871–4): 222–77.

Summary

Discusses heliotropism in plant cotyledons. Asks for information.

Letter details

Letter no.
DCP-LETT-11881
From
Charles Robert Darwin
To
Hugo de Vries
Sent from
Down
Source of text
Artis Library (De Vries 5)
Physical description
LS(A) 4pp

Please cite as

Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 11881,” accessed on 18 April 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-11881.xml

letter