From A. R. Smith 16 October 1877
37 Old Market St | Bristol.
Oct 16th/77
Charles Darwin Esq
Dear Sir
In your “Descent of Man” (Chapter VIII “On the Relation between the period of Development” etc) you give as a general rule that characters inherited by the sex they first appeared in only appear late in life.1 It struck me that the following might be one of the causes of the exceptions: that they first appeared late in life but have been transmitted at earlier & earlier periods, according to the rule you give in “Inheritance at corresponding periods of Life”, till at last they appear about the time of birth & that by the time they had worked down (so to speak) to this point they had become correlated with sex.2
perhaps exceptions to converse of the second rule, viz that characters which are inherited by both sexes generally appear early in life, are occasionally caused by a reverse process.
Hoping that you will excuse my writing to you, | I remain | Yours truly | A R Smith
P.S. In your preface you say that the causes of correlation are unknown.3 Would it not be sometimes caused (as I have taken for granted) by the correlated characters having appeared together for a long time & so, through inheritance, have acquired a strong tendency to appear together?
Footnotes
Bibliography
Descent: The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. By Charles Darwin. 2 vols. London: John Murray. 1871.
Summary
Gives a possible explanation of exceptions to CD’s observation [Descent, ch. 7] that characters correlated with one sex tend to appear late in life.
Letter details
- Letter no.
- DCP-LETT-11186
- From
- Austin Rogers Smith
- To
- Charles Robert Darwin
- Sent from
- Bristol
- Source of text
- DAR 177: 182
- Physical description
- ALS 3pp
Please cite as
Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 11186,” accessed on 26 September 2022, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-11186.xml