skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

To Hermann Müller   18 July 1880

Down, Beckenham, Kent

July 18. 1880.

My dear Sir

… I likewise enjoyed your well-merited castigation of M. Bonnier.1 The book appeared to me a most unsatisfactory one; but I was interested by his evidence of at least the occasional reabsorption of nectar.—2

Yours very faithfully | Ch. Darwin

Footnotes

In the July 1880 issue of Kosmos, Müller had written an essay review of Gaston Bonnier’s Les nectaires: étude critique, anatomique et physiologique (Nectaries: a critical anatomical and physiological study; Bonnier 1879a) titled ‘Gaston Bonniers angebliche Widerlegung der modernen Blumentheorie’ (Gaston Bonnier’s supposed refutation of modern floral theory; H. Müller 1880b). In the highly critical article, Müller dismissed Bonnier’s study as mere teleological speculation and a chain of logical errors.
Bonnier had observed that in Reseda odorata (mignonette), nectar produced on the underside of the disc, which was abundant when the flower opened, was reabsorbed after fertilisation (Bonnier 1879a, pp. 108–9).

Bibliography

Bonnier, Gaston. 1879a. Les nectaires: étude critique, anatomique et physiologique. Paris: G. Masson.

Müller, Hermann. 1880c. Gaston Bonniers angebliche Widerlegung der modernen Blumentheorie. Kosmos 7: 219–36.

Summary

Enjoyed HM’s castigation of Gaston Bonnier ["Gaston Bonniers angebliche Widerlegung der modernen Blumentheorie", Kosmos 7 (1880): 219–36].

Letter details

Letter no.
DCP-LETT-12473
From
Charles Robert Darwin
To
Heinrich Ludwig Hermann (Hermann) Müller
Sent from
Down
Source of text
DAR 146: 441
Physical description
C 1p inc

Please cite as

Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 12473,” accessed on 19 April 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-12473.xml

letter