skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

From Robert Caspary   17 December 1876

Koenigsberg am Rh

17.12. 1876

Dear Sir,

I feel very much obliged to you for your kind present: The effects of cross & self fertilisation, which I certainly shall read with the greatest interest1

What a curious thing it is, that your son Francis found nectaries on Pteris aquilina, certainly it is out of question that in this case they have the destination of alluring insects for fertilisation.2

I shall wright to Dr Hooker on account of the repeated introduction of Euryale, of which nothing is known. as also on the case, which he asserts, that the same stock of Victoria bears 2 flowers at the same time.3 I heard only once of this from Mr Linden, the famous gardener at Brussels, who told me that at Brussels once the Victoria in the Zoological garden had two flowers at a time, one going off the other opening, but I thought no more of it, than I though of that figure of the Victoria regia in Chatsworth once published in the London illustrated news as also in Flora des terres (there even by Planchon), on which three flowers, all opened, are represented as flowering at the same time at the same stock.4 That is fancy. But even if Mr Linden was right, as regards the crossing of one flower by the pollen of the other, two flowers open at the same time have no effect, because the one, the younger is perfectly closed, no insects ever will be able, at least not ours, to carry the pollen from the older flower, which certainly will also have the anthers covered with the parastamens,5 to the younger, or rather to its stigmatic disc, which is as yet not accessible, but will be so only the next night after.

With Euryale it is the same thing. I have seen as of Victoria hundreds of flowers of it, but all single. Only in Autumn if all possibility of bringing seed is over, because the necessary warmth is gone, from the beginning of September in this country, two, three or even 4 flower may be seen over water on the same plant, and even partly opened at the same time, but this has nothing to do with the question on hand.

I am sorry to say I got this year no seed from both stocks of Euryale which I had, not because I believe your theory right, but because in spring all seedlings perished repeatedly by a fungus (a Saprolegnia6 probably), so I got only towards the middle of May two good seedlings, these began to flower towards the end of August, but then it was too late in the year, for bearing seed here. Last year I had the largest plants of Euryale, I ever saw; the leaves had 4 feet in diameter. I have still seed of 1875, but these are not quite safe for procuring plants in 1877 and I shall probably be obliged to get seed from some other garden.

Believe me, dear Sir, yours most truly and faithfully | Rob. Caspary

Footnotes

Caspary’s name is on CD’s presentation list for Cross and self fertilisation (see Appendix III).
See Cross and self fertilisation, p. 404; Pteris aquilina is a synonym of Pteridium aquilinum subsp. aquilinum (southern bracken fern). Francis included an appendix on the nectar glands of Pteris aquilina in F. Darwin 1876d.
Euryale and Victoria are genera of waterlily in the family Nymphaeaceae. Caspary had corresponded with CD about Euryale ferox (foxnut) in 1866 and 1868 (see, for example, Correspondence vol. 16, letter from Robert Caspary, 18 February 1868). Caspary thought that Euryale ferox was highly self-fertile and advanced it, with Victoria regia, as a case opposed to CD’s doctrine of the necessity or advantage of occasional crossing. Caspary held that since E. ferox had only been introduced once, in 1809, and only produced one flower at a time, it must have been self-fertlised for the last fifty-six generations; however, Joseph Dalton Hooker said that it had been introduced repeatedly, and that at Kew both E. ferox and V. regia produced several flowers at the same time (Cross and self fertilisation, pp. 358, 365). Victoria regia is a synonym of V. amazonica
Jean Jules Linden was scientific director of the Parc Léopold, Brussels, from 1852 to 1861. The drawing of Victoria regia at Chatsworth appeared in the Illustrated London News, 17 November 1849, p. 328. Jules Emile Planchon did a series of drawings in Flore des serres et des jardins de l’Europe 6: 191–224.
Parastamen: an abortive stamen (Jackson 1900).
Saprolegnia is a genus of freshwater mould, commonly known as cotton mould.

Bibliography

Correspondence: The correspondence of Charles Darwin. Edited by Frederick Burkhardt et al. 29 vols to date. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1985–.

Cross and self fertilisation: The effects of cross and self fertilisation in the vegetable kingdom. By Charles Darwin. London: John Murray. 1876.

Jackson, Benjamin Daydon. 1900. A glossary of botanic terms: with their description and accent. London: Duckworth & Co. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippencott Company.

Summary

Thanks for copy of Cross and self-fertilisation.

Francis Darwin’s observation of nectaries in Pteris is most curious.

Doubts cross-fertilisation in the rare cases of two flowers on the same stalk in Victoria and Euryale.

Letter details

Letter no.
DCP-LETT-10726
From
Johann Xaver Robert (Robert) Caspary
To
Charles Robert Darwin
Sent from
Königsberg
Source of text
DAR 161: 123
Physical description
ALS 4pp

Please cite as

Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 10726,” accessed on 20 April 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-10726.xml

Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 24

letter