skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

To F. C. Donders   29 March 1872

Down | Beckenham | Kent

March 29. | 1872

My dear Professor Donders

In your letter about the eyes of a person lost in meditation, which interested me so much, you shew that the eyes are not fixed, & that the lines of vision even diverge; the divergence being greater, the more the eyes are upturned. You consider this divergence as passive, or as due to the relaxation “of the internal muscles”.1 Now I am anxious to learn which are these muscles; & why, when all the muscles are passive, do these pull the eyeballs, & the more outwards the more the eyes are upturned? Are they stronger than the other muscles, so as to conquer them when all are equally passive or relaxed? I am the more anxious to understand this, from what Sir C. Bell of the rolling upwards & inwards of the eyes during sleep, fainting &c   He accounts for this movement by the four voluntary straight muscles ceasing to act as consciousness fails, & being then overmastered by the oblique muscles, which he says are little or not at all under the power of the will.2

Is this correct? I ask because I have heard that Bell was mistaken about the oblique muscles. But what most concerns & perplexes me is, that according to Bell, when consciousness begins to fail & the muscles of the eye are relaxed, the eyeballs are turned upwards, & inwards;3 where as you have shewn that when the mind is lost in meditation & the muscles are relaxed, the eyeballs are turned outwards, & so much the more outwards the more the eyeballs are upturned. If during incipient sleep or fainting the eyeballs had rolled outwards, the 2 cases wd. have been harmonious. Now will you forgive me for being so very troublesome, & before long try to remove my difficulty?

I am now getting on pretty well with my essay on Expression, but I have been sadly delayed by ill health all last summer & Autumn.4

With cordial thanks for your former kind & to me invaluable assistance, believe me | my dear Professor Donders | yours very sincerely | Charles Darwin

Footnotes

Charles Bell had described the action of the eye under such circumstances as ‘not a voluntary one’ and ‘irresistible’ (Bell 1844, p. 102). CD scored this section of the text in his copy (see Marginalia 1: 48).
See Bell 1844, p. 185.
CD’s health had been poor during the summer of 1871 and a month-long vacation had done nothing to help. He wrote his publisher, John Murray, that he had been so unwell for six weeks that he could do ‘absolutely nothing’ (Correspondence vol. 19, letter to John Murray, 23 September [1871]).

Bibliography

Bell, Charles. 1844. The anatomy and philosophy of expression as connected with the fine arts. Preface by George Bell, and an appendix on the nervous system by Alexander Shaw. 3d edition, enlarged. London: John Murray.

Correspondence: The correspondence of Charles Darwin. Edited by Frederick Burkhardt et al. 29 vols to date. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1985–.

Marginalia: Charles Darwin’s marginalia. Edited by Mario A. Di Gregorio with the assistance of Nicholas W. Gill. Vol. 1. New York and London: Garland Publishing. 1990.

Summary

Comments on action of eyes in a person lost in meditation. Asks about Charles Bell’s explanation [in Anatomy of expression (1806, 1844)].

Letter details

Letter no.
DCP-LETT-8257
From
Charles Robert Darwin
To
Frans Cornelis (Franciscus Cornelius) Donders
Sent from
Down
Source of text
American Philosophical Society (Mss.B.D25.)
Physical description
C 4pp

Please cite as

Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 8257,” accessed on 18 April 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-8257.xml

Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 20

letter