Darwin, C. R. to Doubleday, Henry
- +
Has been interested in copy of HD's letter to H. T. Stainton on numerical proportions of the sexes of insects. Do they vary during different years?
- +
Does he have opinions about the courtships of butterflies?
- +
Will send a copy of his paper on Primula when it is published. [See 5997.]
Summary Add
Transcription
Down. | Bromley. | Kent. S.E.
March 1.
My dear Sir
M
Have you ever observed any marked difference in the numbers of the sexes during different years,—the males one season being in excess & the females during another, or conversely.—
M
Can you throw any light on the courtship of Butterflies: I think I
have seen several males pursuing one female; now does the female
favour one, or does the strongest male drive away the others; or is
it, as D
Perhaps you will remember having kindly sent me living specimens of Primula elatior; at last I have found time to draw up for Linn. Soc. an account of some observations on their powers of reproduction. It is as good a species as any in the world.— I will send you a copy of my paper whenever it is published.—
Pray believe me | My Dear Sir | Yours very faithfully | Charles Darwin
My address for next 10 days will be 6. Queen Anne St. | Cavendish
Sq
- +
- f1 5966a.f1
The year is established by the relationship between this letter and the letter from H. T. Stainton, 29 February 1868. - +
- f2 5966a.f2
Henry Tibbats Stainton had enclosed a copy of a letter from Doubleday with his letter of 29 February 1868. - +
- f3 5966a.f3
See letter from H. T. Stainton, 29 February 1868. - +
- f4 5966a.f4
Alexander Wallace had written two letters to CD discussing sex ratios in silk moths, but he had not argued that a collector would be more likely to choose female caterpillars (see letters from Alexander Wallace, 25 February 1868 and 28 February 1868). In a letter of 14 March 1868, Wallace corrected CD on this point. - +
- f5 5966a.f5
In his letter of 25 February 1868, Wallace had described female moths of Bombyx cynthia (now Samia cynthia) as passive and receptive to the first male that appeared. - +
- f6 5966a.f6
Doubleday had first called CD's attention to the existence of a form of oxlip (Primula elatior, the Bardfield oxlip) distinct from the common oxlip in 1860, and had supplied him with seedlings (see Correspondence vol. 8, letter from Henry Doubleday, 3 May 1860, and `Specific difference in Primula', p. 449). CD's crossing experiments established that P. elatior was a distinct species and not a hybrid form. CD's paper, `Specific difference in Primula', was read on 19 March 1868, and published in the 23 June 1868 issue of the Journal of the Linnean Society (Botany). - +
- f7 5966a.f7
CD arrived at the house of his brother, Erasmus Alvey Darwin, on 3 March 1868, then stayed at Sarah Elizabeth Wedgwood's house at 4 Chester Place, London, from 11 March, returning home on 1 April (see `Journal' (Correspondence vol. 16, Appendix II)).